Kornilov speech [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] (in Soviet historiography - the Kornilov rebellion , Kornilovism [6] ) - an unsuccessful attempt to establish a military dictatorship made by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army from the infantry L. G. Kornilov in August (September) 1917 with the goal of restoring “solid power” in Russia and preventing the left radicals ( Bolsheviks ) coming to power with the help of military force [6] .
The speech took place against the backdrop of an acute socio-political crisis in Russia and a fall in the authority of the Provisional Government . Under these conditions, Kornilov demanded the resignation of the government and the granting of extraordinary powers to him, putting forward a program of “saving the motherland” (militarization of the country, liquidation of revolutionary democratic organizations, the introduction of the death penalty, etc.), which was mainly supported by the Minister-Chairman of the Provisional Government A F. Kerensky , but its implementation was recognized as "untimely" [6] .
Background to Events
In the summer of 1917, the situation in Petrograd was turbulent. The First All-Russian Congress of Soviets of Workers 'and Soldiers' Deputies on June 3-24 (June 16 - July 7), which was dominated by Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks, supported the bourgeois Provisional Government and rejected the Bolshevik demand for an end to the war and the transfer of power to the Soviets. Soon, however, in Petrograd, anti-government protests took place, caused by a military defeat at the front . The unrest that began with the spontaneous actions of the soldiers of the 1st machine gun regiment, workers of the Petrograd factories, Kronstadt sailors under the slogans of the immediate resignation of the Provisional Government , the transfer of power to the Soviets and negotiations with Germany on the conclusion of peace , was led by the Bolsheviks [7] , uniting the discontented under their slogans. On July 4 (17), the Provisional Government was forced to introduce martial law in the city [8] .
On July 24 ( August 6 ), 1917 , the second coalition government was created, which included 7 representatives of the socialist parties (Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks) against 4 Cadets, and the Socialist Revolutionary A.F. Kerensky headed the government. Instead of General A. A. Brusilov, he appointed the General from Infantry L. G. Kornilov as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief instead of General A. A. Brusilov : the Minister-Chairman was bribed by the General’s loyalty to the government, his authority among the military, and the democracy of convictions ; Considering the fact that in Petrograd the armed protest of a part of the garrison , supported by the Bolsheviks had just been suppressed, “hard power” was also required in the rear [7] .
B.V. Savinkov , in connection with the new appointment of the general, wrote about Kornilov [7] [9] :
|
General Kornilov was able to escape from Austrian captivity in 1916, was extremely popular among the troops, enjoyed authority in the military circles [7] , officers began to close around him, the Cossacks - generally all circles who were in opposition to the expanding revolutionary processes, which they regarded as the collapse of the country. First of all, these were right-wing circles associated with the nobility and large owners. According to V. M. Chernov , “Kornilov did not have to look for assistants. His defiant behavior became a signal for the whole of Russia. Representatives of the Union of Officers, led by Novosiltsev, appeared on their own and expressed a desire to work to save the army. Delegates from the Cossack Council and the Union of St. George Knights arrived. The republican center promised Kornilov the support of influential circles and transferred the military forces of the Petrograd organizations to his disposal. General Krymov sent a messenger to the committee of the Union of Officers of the Russian Federation with an order to find out whether it’s true that “something is being planned” and to inform him whether he should accept the 11th army proposed by Denikin or stay with the 3rd corps which he is to as he put it, "go somewhere." He was asked to stay with the 3rd building. ” The movement was financially supported by the largest Russian capitalists: Ryabushinsky, Morozovs, Tretyakov, Putilov, Vyshnegradsky and others [10] .
Already in April 1917, among the officers dissatisfied with the new order, the idea of establishing a military dictatorship gained popularity; many military organizations were formed, among which, by mid-summer, the most influential were the Military League, the Union of St. George Knights (headquarters were in Petrograd ), and the Union of Army and Navy Officers created at Headquarters in Mogilev . The aspirations of the military were supported by several civic organizations, including the Society for the Economic Revival of Russia, headed by A.I. Guchkov and A.I. Putilov, and the Republican Center, which even created its own military department, to coordinate the actions of various officer organizations. Various candidates were nominated for the post of military dictator in spring and summer, including M.V. Alekseev, A.A. Brusilov and A.V. Kolchak , however, after the appointment of L. G. Kornilov as Supreme Commander, he naturally turned out to be the main and only candidate for dictators.
Kerensky generally agreed with Kornilov’s many views on the situation in the country and ways out of it — both believed that the monarchy was a thing of the past, sought to preserve Russia as a great power, and saw Russia's participation in the war primarily as fidelity to the allied obligations of the country and state as a member Entente. At the same time, Kerensky, a prominent representative of the radical left-liberal part of the Russian intelligentsia, from his youth was used to distrust and suspicion of the military estate, since in Tsarist Russia it was the bearer of the traditions of loyalty to autocracy, and professional military Kornilov, certainly brought up in the spirit of patriotic sacrifice, as a Russian officer who, according to the Charter, was forbidden to engage in and be interested in politics, saw a solution to the crisis of the fantastic, rapid degradation of society and, most vnoe - the army, the leading heavy war - in building the elementary discipline in the armed forces and conducting a solid policy. Kerensky, “pushing away” Kornilov and trusting the warnings about the “danger to the right”, signed the death sentence for the country, and at the same time he did not fully believe that he had done the right thing, hesitated all the time and was in a state of affectation and shock at the end of the summer.
On July 21, the English ambassador Buchanan conveyed the words spoken to him politically close to Kerensky by Foreign Minister Tereshchenko: “There is only one thing left: the introduction of martial law throughout the country, the use of military courts against railroad workers and forcing peasants to sell grain. The government should recognize General Kornilov; several members of the government should remain at headquarters for permanent communication with him. To my question about whether Kerensky shares his views, Tereshchenko answered in the affirmative, but said that the prime minister’s hands were tied ” [10] . At the same time, the introduction of a military dictatorship and the dispersal of the Soviet made Kerensky himself superfluous and jeopardized his political survival. Objectively, Kerensky could retain power only by tacking between the right and the Soviets; this explains the ambiguous behavior of Kerensky throughout the entire Kornilov conspiracy, reinforced by the personal antipathy that soon arose between Kerensky and Kornilov [11] .
At the State Conference , which was held in Moscow on August 12-15 (25-28), Kornilov vividly showed his political claims, thereby entering into conflict with Kerensky. Kerensky, who was trying to remove Kornilov from political activity, reluctantly agreed to participate in the meeting, making it a condition that Kornilov talked about purely military issues; nevertheless, Kornilov made a vivid political speech that made a great impression; and chanted in one of Marina Tsvetaeva’s poems (“Cossack’s son, Cossack ... That was how it began - Speech”). Although the soldiers present at the meeting defiantly did not stand up when Kornilov appeared, the audience enthusiastically greeted his speech, and when Kornilov exited, they threw flowers at him, and the cadets and Tekins carried him on their shoulders [10] [12] .
An important role in the future events of August related to the name of General Kornilov was played by the private meeting of members of the cadet parties and the Octobrists and former members of the State Committee held at the apartment of the Moscow city commissioner, member of the Cadet Party Central Committee N. M. Kishkin on the initiative of MV Rodzianko Dumas P. N. Milyukov, V. A. Maklakov, I. Shingarev, S. I. Shidlovsky, N. V. Savich. The headquarters spokesman, Colonel Rozhenko, reported a brewing conflict between Kornilov and Kerensky, the possible nomination of cavalry units in Petrograd "to eliminate the attempt of a Bolshevik coup," the dispersal of the Council and the Provisional Government and the transfer of power to the Duma [10] . Also, reports were made by representatives of the "Union of Officers" Colonels Novosiltsev and Pronin on the "Kornilov program", the speakers stated the need for "public support" of the general. According to Savich's recollections, these reports gave the impression of “unexpectedly naive and childishly thoughtless” [13] . "It became clear to us that everything, absolutely everything in this adventure was not thought out and prepared, there is only chatter and good intentions." Speakers from the Cadet Party, P. N. Milyukov and Prince G. N. Trubetskoy, spoke of the importance, and, at the same time, of the impossibility of a military dictatorship if it was not supported by the masses. As a result, it seemed that the cadets supported Kornilov. However, Makiltakov told Novosiltsev about the fallacy of such confidence: "I am afraid that we will provoke Kornilov." On the eve of the Meeting, public appeals of support to the Commander-in-Chief were also made by the “Union of Officers”, “Union of St. George Cavaliers”, “Union of Cossack Troops”, a congress of non-socialist organizations and others. The historian V. Zh. Tsvetkov states that all this instilled in Kornilov confidence in his sympathy not only for the generals and politicians, but also for officers and soldiers [7] .
Meanwhile, the situation at the front was deteriorating; August 21 ( September 3 ) 1917 German troops captured Riga ; Kornilov's barrage detachments not only did not help, but also intensified the fierceness of the soldiers against the officers [14] .
The Kornilov Program and the Political Views of General Kornilov
Contrary to the assertions of some historians, General Kornilov never, before his August speech, or during him - neither officially, nor in private conversations and conversations, set a definite “political program”. He did not have it, just as he did not (along with Kerensky) have direct social and political slogans. The document, known in history as the “Kornilov Program”, was the result of the collective work of Bykhov prisoners - persons imprisoned in Bykhov prison with General Kornilov on charges of supporting him after the failure of the Kornilov speech. According to General Denikin , co-author of this program, it was needed as a correction to the “gap of the past” - the need to announce a strictly business program to keep the country from its final collapse and fall. After compilation, the program was approved by General Kornilov and appeared in print without a date and under the guise of a program of one of his past speeches, because, in the conditions in which its authors were, it was difficult, according to General Denikin, to publish the Bykhov Program [15] .
“Kornilov program”:
- 1) The establishment of a government that is completely independent of all irresponsible organizations - from now on until the Constituent Assembly.
- 2) Establishment of local authorities and courts, independent of unauthorized organizations.
- 3) The war is in full unity with the allies until the conclusion of a speedy peace that ensures the wealth and vital interests of Russia.
- 4) The creation of a combat-ready army and organized rear — without politics, without the intervention of committees and commissars, and with firm discipline.
- 5) Ensuring the vital activity of the country and the army by streamlining transport and restoring the productivity of factories and plants; streamlining the food business by attracting cooperatives and a trade apparatus regulated by the government.
- 6) The resolution of the main state, national and social issues is postponed until the Constituent Assembly [16] .
During his appointment to the post of Supreme Commander-in-Chief on July 19, 1917, General Kornilov demanded that the government recognize his responsibility "only to his own conscience and to all the people", thus establishing, according to Denikin, a kind of "original scheme of sovereign military command." The statement mainly concerned the military unit, in particular, the provision to the Commander-in-Chief of full autonomy in all military matters, such as the solution of operational tasks, the appointment and removal of command personnel. He demanded Kornilov and the introduction of the death penalty at the front.
In conversations with a number of people, General Kornilov put forward various forms of “strong power”, for example, the reformation of Kerensky’s cabinet on a national basis, the change of head of government, the introduction of the Supreme Commander into the government, the combination of the posts of Minister of the Chairman and Supreme Commander, directory, sole dictatorship. General Kornilov himself was inclined toward a single-handed dictatorship, without, however, setting it as an end in itself and attaching great importance to the fact of legitimacy and legitimate succession of power.
On July 30, at a meeting with the Ministers of Railways and Food, General Kornilov expressed the following views:
To end the war in a world worthy of a great, free Russia, we need to have three armies: an army in the trenches, directly leading the battle, an army in the rear - in workshops and factories, manufacturing everything for the front army, and a railway army bringing it to the front
Without going into the question of what measures are needed to improve the working and railway components and allowing specialists to understand this, the general nevertheless believed that “for the proper operation of these armies, they must be subordinate to the same iron discipline that is established for the front army ".
The note by General Kornilov, prepared for the report to the Provisional Government, spoke about the need for the following main events:
- the introduction throughout the territory of Russia of the rear troops and the population of the jurisdiction of military revolutionary courts, with the death penalty for a number of grave crimes, mainly military ones;
- restoration of disciplinary authority of military commanders;
- introduction of the narrow scope of the committees and the establishment of their responsibility to the law.
On August 3, General Kornilov presented a note to Kerensky in Petrograd , but the latter, having previously expressed his fundamental agreement with the measures proposed by Kornilov, persuaded the general not to submit the note to the government directly on that day, motivating this desire with the desirability of completing similar work of the War Department for mutual coordination of projects. However, the very next day, August 4, a copy of General Kornilov’s note was at the disposal of the Izvestia newspaper, which began printing extracts from the Kornilov’s note, and at the same time a broad campaign began against Kornilov.
Regarding the key agricultural issue in those circumstances, Kornilov had a program developed for him by Professor Yakovlev; it assumed a partial nationalization of the land with the endowment, however, not of all peasants, but only soldiers who returned from the front, with a number of seizures in favor of landowners [10] .
According to General Denikin, "the political appearance of General Kornilov remained unclear for many" and legends were built around this issue, which had their source in the environment of Lavr Georgievich, who, due to his excessive tolerance and credulity of a general who was poorly versed in people, got "small-state or completely unprincipled. " This Denikin saw the deepest tragedy of the activities of General Kornilov.
Lavr Georgievich was neither a socialist nor a monarchist : like the overwhelming majority of the officers at that time, he was alien to political passions. Denikin believed that according to the views and convictions of General Kornilov was close to the "wide layers of liberal democracy" [17] . As Commander-in-Chief, General Kornilov had more than other military leaders of courage and courage to oppose the destruction of the army and in defense of the officers. [18]
Nomination of Kornilov troops to Petrograd
Already in the days of the Moscow meeting, threatening movements of units loyal to Kornilov began: the cavalry corps of Major General A. Dolgorukov moved to Finland from Finland, and the 7th Orenburg Cossack Regiment moved to Moscow. They were stopped respectively by the commanders of the Petrograd and Moscow military districts [19]
After that, the most reliable units from the point of view of Kornilov were concentrated in the Nevel , Novosokolnikov and Velikiye Luki areas: the 3rd cavalry corps and the 3rd brigade of the "Wild Division" —the Ingush and Circassian regiments, under the command of the very right-wing political views general Lieutenant AM Krymov . The meaning of this concentration, absurd from a military point of view, was clear: created a bridgehead for the march on Petrograd According to the memoirs of the commander of a regiment, Prince Ukhtomsky, officers understood this perfectly:. "The general opinion has declined that we are going to Petrograd ... We knew that a coup would soon take place, which would end the power of the Petrograd Council and declare either a directory or dictatorship with the consent of Kerensky and with his participation, which under these conditions was a guarantee of the complete success of the coup ". When the chief of staff of Kornilov, General Lukomsky, still not initiated into the plot, demanded an explanation, (August 11) Kornilov informed him that he intended to protect the Provisional Government from the attack of the Bolsheviks and Soviets even against Oli government itself. He “hangs German agents and spies led by Lenin” and disperses the Soviets. Kornilov wanted to entrust this operation to Krymov, since he knew that he “did not hesitate to hang all the members of the Council of Workers 'and Soldiers' Deputies on the lanterns.” Perhaps at the last moment he will be able to conclude an agreement with the Provisional Government, but if the agreement of the latter fails, nothing terrible will happen: "then they themselves will thank me." There was no real threat to the Bolshevik speech at that moment (the Bolsheviks were defeated and discredited as German spies after the July days ), but the Kornilovites in every possible way exaggerated the allegations about her [10] [20] .
Meanwhile, the Germans' breakthrough near Riga, on the one hand, posed a real threat to Petrograd, and on the other, gave reason to use this threat to "restore order." The relocation of the Headquarters to the territory of the Petrograd Military District in connection with this also created an ambiguous and alarming situation for Kerensky. Kerensky, whose relations with Kornilov became aggravated after the Moscow meeting, now decided to enter into an alliance with him. The agreement was worked out thanks to Savinkov; Kerensky gave Kornilov considerable power, hoping that he would clear his environment at Headquarters from too open and warlike reactionaries. On August 20 ( September 2 ), 1917 Kerensky, according to Savinkov’s report, agreed to “declare Petrograd and its environs martial law and to arrive in Petrograd military corps for the real implementation of this provision, that is, to fight the Bolsheviks” [21] . On August 21 ( September 3 ) 1917, the Provisional Government approved the decision to separate the Petrograd Military District into direct submission to the Headquarters. It was assumed that both military and civilian power in the district would belong to Kornilov, but Petrograd itself would remain under the authority of the government; The 3rd Cavalry Corps, as especially reliable, will be handed over to Kerensky, but not under the command of Krymov, but another, more liberal and loyal to the government, commander. From reliable parts it was supposed to form a Special Army at the direct disposal of the government. At the same time, Savinkov was appointed Governor General of Petrograd - thus, the de facto fate of the country was in the hands of the triumvirate of Kerensky - Kornilov - Savinkov. This decision was brought to Headquarters on August 24 ( September 6 ), 1917 . After this, Kornilov, on the one hand, issued an order to the commander of the 1st Kuban Cossack Division P.N. Krasnov to take command of the 3rd cavalry corps (in fact, Krasnov took command of the corps only on August 29 ( September 11 ) 1917 ), and on the other On August 25 ( September 7 ) 1917 he advanced the 3rd Corps (still under the command of Krymov) and the Wild Division, as well as the cavalry corps of Dolgorukov to Petrograd. Thus, the movement of Kornilov’s troops to Petrograd began absolutely legally [7] . Kornilov formally set the task for Krymov: 1) “If, from me or directly on the spot (information) about the beginning of the Bolsheviks’s speech, immediately move with the corps to Petrograd, occupy the city, disarm the units of the Petrograd garrison that will join the Bolshevik movement, disarm the population Petrograd and disperse advice; 2) Upon completion of this task, General Krymov had to allocate one brigade with artillery to Oranienbaum and upon arrival there, demand from the Kronstadt garrison the disarmament of the fortress and the transition to the mainland ” [22] . To get a reason to send troops to Petrograd and a coup, it was planned to organize a provocative pseudo-Bolshevik demonstration on August 27 ( September 9 ) 1917 , and this task was assigned to the chairman of the Council of the Union of Cossack Units General Dutov [19] [20] .
On August 25–26 (September 7–8), a feeling reigned in Stavka that the coup was developing without any obstacles — even too, suspiciously smoothly. Options for power arrangements were discussed. The Directory project was put forward as part of Kornilov, Savinkov and Filonenko (Social Revolutionary, assistant and proxy to Savinkov). The project of the Kerensky-Kornilov-Savinkov directory was also put forward. Another project involved the creation of a coalition government of the so-called. "Council of People’s Defense." It was supposed to introduce Admiral A. V. Kolchak (manager of the Ministry of the Sea), G. V. Plekhanov (Minister of Labor), A. I. Putilova (Minister of Finance), S. N. Tretyakova (Minister of Trade and Industry), I. G. Tsereteli (Minister of Posts and Telegraphs), as well as Savinkova (Minister of War) and Filonenko (Minister of Foreign Affairs). Even the introduction of the “grandmother of the Russian revolution” E. K. Breshko-Breshkovskaya into the cabinet was supposed. Kornilov was supposed to become the chairman of the “Council”, and Kerensky was his deputy. The discussions at Headquarters also spoke of a directory consisting of Kerensky-Kornilov-Savinkov as the highest governing body of the country before the Constituent Assembly . At the same time, already without agreement with the government, a draft order was prepared at Headquarters on the introduction of a state of siege in Petrograd ( curfews , censorship , prohibition of rallies and demonstrations, disarmament of the garrison that resist, military courts ). At the same time, the Union of Officers, with the knowledge of Kornilov, proposed the liquidation of the Council and the arrest of the Bolsheviks in Petrograd by the forces of mobile officer-junkers, thus putting Kerensky before the fact. These deviations from the agreed plan did not hide from Kerensky, which caused him alarm and distrust [7] [19] .
On August 25 ( September 7 ), 1917 , the cadet ministers resigned - this was part of the plan that Kornilov’s had previously conceived. At the same time, the Socialist-Revolutionary Minister Chernov resigned, who, on the contrary, did not want to take part in the pro-Kornilov’s intrigue [10] . Meanwhile, on August 22 ( September 4 ), 1917, a deputy of the State Duma and a former member of the Provisional Government V.N. Lvov , who enjoyed a reputation as a near, naive and frivolous [23] , tried to act as an intermediary between Kerensky and Stavka. He told Kerensky that the Soviets were slowly but surely falling into the hands of the Bolsheviks and would no longer help Kerensky; at the same time, "anger against the Soviets is growing ... it is already breaking out and ending in a massacre." Threatening Kerensky with personal death in this “massacre” if he did not “break with the Soviets”, Lviv, on behalf of the pro-Kornilov forces, suggested that he form a right-wing government, and in the end, according to Lvov, even obtained words of consent to resign. After that, Lvov went to Headquarters to discuss with Kornilov the conditions of the latter to Kerensky.
On August 24 ( September 6 ), 1917, he had a conversation with Kornilov, in which Kornilov formulated the idea of introducing martial law in Petrograd, concentrating the power of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief and the Minister-Chairman in the same hands (“of course, all this is before the Constituent Assembly”), declaring readiness hand over the portfolio of the Minister of Justice to Kerensky, and the Minister of War to Savinkov. He also asked Lvov “to warn Kerensky and Savinkov that I’m not guaranteeing their life anywhere, and therefore let them come to Headquarters, where I will take their personal safety under my protection”. On August 26, with this message, Lvov arrived at Kerensky [7] [19] [24] .
Kornilov's declaration of rebel
August 26 ( September 8 ) 1917 V. Lvov met with Kerensky and handed him the conditions of Kornilov. At the same time, he also retold the moods that dominated the Headquarters and were sharply negative in relation to Kerensky, and retold in such a way that this could be mistaken for the words of Kornilov himself. As a result, Kerensky, who hesitated, was afraid of Kornilov and was in an excited and nervous state, had the impression that Kornilov ultimately required him to lay down his power and come to Headquarters, where he was preparing to kill him. From that moment on, Kerensky’s actions were aimed at “proving immediately the formal connection between Lvov and Kornilov so clearly that the Provisional Government would be able to take decisive measures that very evening.” Kerensky invited Lvov to write down his demands on paper, after which the following note was drawn up last:
General Kornilov offers:
1) Declare Petrograd martial law.
2) Transfer all power, military and civilian, to the hands of the Supreme Commander.
3) The resignation of all ministers, not excluding the minister-chairman, and the transfer of the interim management of the ministries to the ministerial comrades, until the formation of the cabinet by the Supreme Commander.
Lvov subsequently assured that what he expressed was not an ultimatum, but “different wishes in the sense of strengthening power” [25] .
Then came negotiations on a direct wire between the close Kerensky V.V. Vyrubov and Kerensky, on the one hand, and Kornilov, on the other, and Kerensky, who was trying to enlist new evidence of the rebellion, entered into negotiations on behalf of (absent) Lvov:
[Kerensky]. - Hello general. The telephone has Vladimir Nikolaevich Lvov and Kerensky. Please confirm that Kerensky can act in accordance with the information transmitted by Vladimir Nikolaevich.
[Kornilov]. - Hello, Alexander Fedorovich, hello, Vladimir Nikolaevich. Reaffirming the outline of the situation in which the country and the army appear to me, the outline made by me to Vladimir Nikolayevich with a request to report to you, I reiterate that the events of recent days and newly emerging imperatively require a very definite decision in the shortest possible time.
[Kerensky]. - I - Vladimir Nikolaevich - I ask you: what specific decision needs to be executed, about which you asked to inform me, Alexander Fedorovich, only completely personally? Without this confirmation, personally from you, Alexander Fedorovich hesitates to completely trust me.
[Kornilov]. - Yes, I confirm that I asked you to convey to Alexander Fedorovich my insistent request to come to Mogilev.
[Kerensky]. - I am Alexander Fedorovich. I understand your answer as a confirmation of the words conveyed to me by Vladimir Nikolaevich. Today you can’t do it and you cannot leave. Hope to leave tomorrow. Do I need Savinkov?
[Kornilov]. - I urge Boris Viktorovich to come with you. What I said to Vladimir Nikolayevich applies equally to Boris Viktorovich. I beg you not to postpone your departure later tomorrow. Please believe that only the awareness of the responsibility of the moment makes me so persistently ask you.
[Kerensky]. - Should I come only in case of speeches about which there are rumors, or in any case?
[Kornilov]. - Anyway.
Kornilov’s answers looked like a confirmation of all Kerensky’s accusations, although in fact they weren’t, since Kerensky’s questions were asked in a general form. Subsequently, Kornilov and his supporters regarded these actions of Kerensky as a provocation . In fact, according to Kornilov, he only confirmed Kerensky’s invitation to Mogilev for negotiations, but did not sign the ultimatum. According to A. I. Denikin, Kerensky was most afraid that “Kornilov’s answer on the most important question - the nature of his proposals” - would refute his interpretation of the “ultimatum”, and therefore deliberately clothed the essence of the question in “deliberately dark forms”.
After that, Kerensky hid in his office behind the curtain the police chief Bulavinsky; in the presence of this witness, Lvov in a new conversation confirmed the contents of the note. According to Bulavinsky’s memoirs, when asked “what were the reasons and motives that made General Kornilov demand that Kerensky and Savinkov come to Headquarters,” he did not answer. After that, Lviv was arrested [7] [19] [26] .
In the evening of August 26 ( September 8 ), 1917, at a government meeting, Kerensky qualified the actions of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief as " rebellion ." However, the government did not side with Kerensky. During the stormy meeting that took place, Kerensky demanded "dictatorial powers" to suppress the "rebellion", but other ministers opposed this and insisted on a peaceful settlement.
Alexander Fedorovich slammed the door several times, threatened that since the ministers did not support him, he would "go to the Soviets"
- Kerensky, A.F. Russia at a historical turn .
As a result, a telegram was hastily compiled, sent to Headquarters signed by Kerensky, in which Kornilov was asked to relinquish his position to General A. S. Lukomsky and immediately leave for the capital [27] .
This telegram without a number received at Stavka at night on August 27 ( September 9 ) 1917 and completely unexpected for Kornilov, signed simply “Kerensky”, was at first mistaken for a fake. Kornilov had just sent a telegram to Kerensky informing him that Krymov’s corps would be in Petrograd on the 28th, and asking them to introduce martial law on the 29th [26] . Meanwhile, a statement by Kerensky was published in the newspapers, beginning with the words: “On August 26, General Kornilov sent me State Duma member V.N. Lvov demanding that the Provisional Government transfer all the fullness of the military and civil power so that he would draw up at his own discretion a new government to govern the country ... "
Kornilov was furious. Kornilov’s response to Kerensky’s statements was a formal declaration of war on the Provisional Government: “The telegram of the Prime Minister No. 4163, in its entire first part, is a complete lie: I didn’t send State Duma member V. Lvov to the Provisional Government, but he came to me, as the messenger of the minister-chairman. Member of the State Duma Alexey Aladyin witnesses this. Thus, a great provocation took place that puts at stake the fate of the Fatherland. Russian people! Our great homeland is dying. The hour of her death is near. Forced to speak openly - I, General Kornilov, declare that the Provisional Government, under pressure from the Bolshevik majority of the Soviets, acts in full accordance with the plans of the German General Staff and, at the same time as the forthcoming landing of enemy forces on the Riga coast, kills the army and shocks the country inside. ( ...) I, General Kornilov, the son of a Cossack peasant, declare to everyone and everyone that I personally do not need anything other than preserving Great Russia, and I swear to bring the people - by defeating the enemy - to the Constituent Assembly, on which he himself will decide his fate, and choose the way of a new state life. But to betray Russia into the hands of its original enemy, the German tribe, and to make the Russian people slaves of the Germans, I cannot do it. And I prefer to die on the field of honor and battle, so as not to see the shame and disgrace of the Russian land. Russian people, in your hands the life of your Motherland! ”
Kornilov categorically refused to give up the post of commander in chief, and General Lukomsky - to accept her. In response to a demand to stop Krymov’s movement, the latter telegraphed Kerensky: “it is impossible to stop the matter that began with your approval” [26] . He refused to stop the echelons and assume the post of commander in chief and commander of the Northern Front, General V.N. Klembovsky . Of the five front commanders, he was one of two who openly supported Kornilov; the second was the commander of the Southwestern Front, A. I. Denikin, who declared his support for Kornilov immediately upon receipt of a telegram from Kerensky on the resignation of the latter.
Kerensky took over command and summoned Alekseev to Petrograd to appoint him commander in chief. He also refused to carry out such an order.
August 28 ( September 10 ) 1917 was followed by a decree to the Governing Senate, formally declaring Kornilov a rebel and traitor. For his part, Kornilov said that he was taking full responsibility.
The reaction of the former Sovereign to newspaper reports about the “betrayal of Kornilov” in connection with the start of the “rebellion” is known: Nikolai Alexandrovich was very indignant and “said with bitterness:“ Is this Kornilov a traitor? ”” [28] [29] .
Taking upon himself the full power, General Kornilov promised to "save Great Russia" and "bring the people through victory to the convocation of the Constituent Assembly." On August 29 ( September 11 ), 1917, the general circulated another appeal in which he announced a conspiracy of the government, the Bolsheviks and Germany, called the bombings in Kazan their planned action, and called for disobedience to government orders [30] .
The speech of General Kornilov was supported by the Union of Officers, Petrograd officer organizations; "Second checker of the Empire" General A. M. Kaledin joined the rebels. The commanders of the four fronts declared their solidarity with the Supreme Commander.
Kornilov's Speech Failure
Meanwhile, the corps of General Krymov continued to move to Petrograd. In accordance with a plan developed in advance, on August 27 ( September 9 ) 1917 in Petrograd, the conspirators appointed a provocative pseudo-Bolshevik demonstration, which was to give an occasion to send Krymov’s troops, disperse the Council and declare the capital in a martial law. The demonstration was to be organized by the chairman of the Council of the Union of Cossack Units Ataman Dutov, but he could not cope with this task: no one followed him [10] .
In the future, Kerensky, the triumvirate of Savinkov, Avksentiev and Skobelev, the Petrograd Duma with A. A. Isaev and Schreider at the head, and the Soviets feverishly began to take measures to suspend the movement of Krymov’s troops ... [31]
On August 28 ( September 10 ) 1917, General Kornilov decided to refuse Kerensky’s fulfillment of his demand (dated August 28) to stop the movement of General Krymov to Petrograd (sent there earlier by decision of the Provisional Government and Kerensky himself) and decides:
... to speak openly and, putting pressure on the Provisional Government, to force him: 1. to exclude from his composition those ministers who, according to [his] information, were obvious traitors to the Motherland;
2. rebuild so that the country is guaranteed a strong and firm power
... using for this purpose the horse corps already moving at the direction of Kerensky to Petrograd and giving it to the commander General A. Krymov the corresponding instruction.
On August 28 ( September 10 ), 1917 Krymov’s troops occupied Luga , disarming the local garrison . At the station of Antropshino, the Kornilovskaya Native Division entered into a firefight with soldiers of the Petrograd garrison [32] . Under the threat of government power, Kerensky is looking for negotiation opportunities, but he is being discouraged from going to Headquarters because of the danger of reprisal - there are rumors that Kerensky was sentenced to death in the army. Help in suppressing a speech to the government was offered by the Soviets. The Provisional Government was forced to resort to the services of Bolshevik agitators to contact the rebel units and distribute weapons to the Petrograd workers, who began to form detachments of their own militia - the Red Guard .
Kerensky issued a decree on dismissal from office and bringing to trial “for rebellion” General Kornilov and his senior associates.
The advance of the Kornilov’s troops was stopped on August 29 ( September 11 ) 1917 on the Vyritsa - Pavlovsk section, where the opponents of Kornilov dismantled the railroad track. Thanks to the agitators sent to contact the rebel units, it was possible to ensure that the latter laid down their arms.
Krymov went to Petrograd, leaving the corps in the vicinity of Luga, at the invitation of Kerensky, who was transferred through a friend of the general, Colonel Samarin, who served as assistant chief of cabinet Kerensky (on September 4, Colonel Samarin was promoted to major general and appointed commander of the troops Irkutsk Military District ...). The details of the conversation between Krymov and Kerensky did not reach us. According to eyewitnesses, from the cabinet doors came the angry voice of General Krymov, denouncing the Prime Minister .
Krymov turned out to be cheated. Leaving Kerensky, with a shot from a revolver, he mortally wounded himself in the chest. A few hours later in the Nikolaev military hospital, under the arena of abuse and mockery of revolutionary democracy, in the person of hospital paramedics and servants, tearing off a wound dressing, Krymov, who occasionally regained consciousness, died [33] .
The widow of the late General Krymov received permission from Kerensky exclusively for a funeral at night and subject to the presence of no more than 9 people, including the clergy .
According to the recollections of the gene. A. Lukomsky, Krymov, through the adjutant, passed the note to Kornilov. Kornilov received the note, but did not acquaint anyone with its contents [34] .
General Kornilov refused offers to leave the Headquarters and "run away." Not wanting bloodshed in response to the assurances of allegiance from the parts loyal to him from the mouth of Captain Nezhentsev ’s General Staff, “say one word, and all Kornilov officers will give their lives for you without hesitation ...” the general replied: “Tell the Kornilov regiment that I order him to comply complete calm, I don’t want at least one drop of brotherly blood to be shed [35] . ”
General Staff from the Infantry General MV V. Alekseev ... "... for the sake of saving the life of the Kornilovites , he decided to take dishonor on his gray head - to become the chief of staff at the" commander-in-chief "Kerensky [36] ." ... agrees to arrest General Kornilov and his associates (generals Romanovsky , Lukomsky and a number of senior officers taken under investigation and placed in Bykhov in the monastery building) in Stavka , which is what September 1 ( 14 ) 1917 does. Kornilovites placed in the Bykhov prison building, General Alekseev tried to ensure maximum security. Nevertheless, this episode turned out to be misunderstood by General Kornilov and subsequently on the Don had a very negative impact on the relations of the two leading generals of the young Volunteer Army . General Kornilov, no doubt, should also have previously been upset by the extreme caution of General Alekseev in terms of supporting the Speech, which sympathized with the desire of General Kornilov to restore order in the army and the country, but did not publicly agree on any point because of the lack of faith in the success of the risky event.
Immediately after this (a week later), General Alekseev resigned from the post of chief of staff under the Supreme Commander-in-Chief - Kerensky [37] ; The general spoke of this brief, only a few days, period of his life, always always with deep excitement and sorrow [38] . Mikhail Vasilievich expressed his attitude towards the Kornilovites in a letter to the editor of Novoye Vremya B. A. Suvorin in this way:
Russia has no right to allow an imminent crime in the near future against its best, valiant sons and skilled generals. Kornilov did not encroach on the political system; he sought, with the assistance of some members of the government, to change the composition of the latter, to select honest, active and energetic people. This is not treason, not rebellion ... [39]
On August 28, the commander -in- chief of the Southwestern Front, General A.I. Denikin , General S.L. Markov , General I.G. Erdeli and a number of others, were also arrested in expressing solidarity with Kornilov’s speech.
( for more on this, see Bykhov’s article )
Summary
The failure of the Kornilov speech had a long-term consequence of exactly what both Kornilov and Kerensky sought to avoid — the coming to power of the Bolsheviks. The right political flank was routed organizationally and morally discredited - for Kerensky this meant, in particular, that he could no longer pursue the old maneuvering policy and was much more dependent on the support of the Soviets. But the Soviets themselves more and more fell into the hands of the Bolsheviks, who, thanks to the active organization of resistance to Kornilov, not only fully recovered and rehabilitated themselves in the eyes of the masses after the July catastrophe, but also launched an active attack. In this respect, the fate of L. D. Trotsky is characteristic: on September 4 ( 17 ), 1917, he, together with other Bolsheviks arrested after the July uprising, was released from Kresty prison, and on September 20 ( October 3 ), 1917, he became chairman of the Petrograd Soviet and even three weeks later in this capacity formed the Military Revolutionary Committee [40] . The Kerensky government, deprived of support from the right, could not oppose anything to the Bolsheviks and was only able to pursue a compromising policy [41] . In his memoirs, L. D. Trotsky noted the rapid radicalization of Soviet circles already during the suppression of Kornilov’s speech:
After the Kornilov days, a new chapter opened for advice. Although the Compromisers still had many rotten places, especially in the garrison, the Petrograd Soviet discovered such a sharp Bolshevik tilt that it surprised both camps: both left and right. On the night of September 1, under the chairmanship of the same Chkheidze, the Council voted for the power of workers and peasants. Ordinary members of the compromising factions almost entirely supported the resolution of the Bolsheviks ... [42]
The historian of the Russian revolution S. P. Melgunov noted the widespread development of Bolshevik cells after the failure of the August speech and that measures, albeit forced, that were taken by the Kerensky government to eliminate the Kornilov movement, dealt a mortal blow to the idea of a coalition government and untied the "irresponsible demagogues" of the camp Bolsheviks called up by Kerensky to fight against Kornilov. Peter Kenes , a modern American historian of the Civil War in Russia, is in solidarity with Melgunov’s conclusions about the strong blow to the idea of the coalition, noting the complete gap between the anti-Bolshevik socialists and the Russian officers who didn’t trust each other and that it was the main reason for the Reds victory in the Civil War lack of cohesion in the camp of their opponents [43] .
While the Bolsheviks and Soviets in the days of August appeared in the eyes of the masses as the saviors of revolutionary democracy, the Provisional Government and Kerensky personally seriously discredited themselves, demonstrating, in the best case, helplessness, and in the worst, their readiness to conspire with "counter-revolution." The cadets, clearly implicated in the Kornilov movement, were politically completely discredited, and the demand for their withdrawal from the government in September-October became one of the basic demands of the Soviet circles. Kerensky himself gave all grounds for Bolshevik propaganda to call himself (through Lenin’s mouth) “Kornilovites who quarreled with Kornilov by chance and continued to be in an intimate alliance with other Kornilovites” [44] .
Moreover, in August days the Bolsheviks were given the opportunity to arm themselves completely legally and create combat structures, which they then used to prepare the coup. According to Uritsky, up to 40 thousand rifles fell into the hands of the Petrograd proletariat. These days in the working areas also began the intensive formation of Red Guard detachments, the disarmament of which after the liquidation of Kornilovsky’s speech was out of the question [45] . This weapon was used by the Bolsheviks against the Provisional Government in less than 2 months - in October 1917 .
Regarding the ability to repulse an armed uprising, the situation was aggravated by Kerensky’s manifested desire after August 1917 to have a person as bright as possible as commander of troops [46] .
General I. P. Romanovsky , one of Bykhov’s prisoners, later said: “They can shoot Kornilov, send his accomplices to hard labor, but Kornilovism in Russia will not perish, since Kornilovism is love for the Motherland, a desire to save Russia, and these high motives not to throw any dirt, not to trample to any haters of Russia ” [47] .
In 1937 , 20 years after the events described, another participant in the events, I. L. Solonevich, wrote in Voice of Russia that the result of the failure of General Kornilov’s conspiracy was Stalin’s power over Russia, and he also described the confrontation between Kerensky and Kornilov:
Gene. L. G. Kornilov can be accused of only one thing: that his conspiracy failed. But General L. Kornilov managed something else:
He did not make exquisite gestures and did not make pathetic speeches. He also did not run in an Indian skirt and did not leave to the mercy of fate the people who believed him. He went to the end. And he found this end in battle.
- Ivan Solonevich . The Kornilov conspiracy // Voice of Russia : newspaper. - No. 38. - March 16, 1937.
Versions
There is a version that General Kornilov, shortly before that, speaking at the Moscow State Conference with a demand for a “strong hand” agreed in advance on the armed speech with the head of the Provisional Government Kerensky, who, during the advance of the Cossacks of Krymov to Petrograd, under pressure from the Petrograd Soviet, changed his initial position and recognized August 27, General Kornilov rebel. According to this version, Kornilov, with the knowledge of A.F. Kerensky, sent the 3rd cavalry corps under the command of General Krymov to Petrograd. Thus, under the pretext of introducing "reliable troops" to neutralize the Bolsheviks, Kornilov got the opportunity to remove the Provisional Government and become a military dictator .
According to another version - Kornilov misunderstood Kerensky.
The rebellion could also be a provocation of Savinkov (who agreed to the introduction of troops) or Lvov , who served as a parliamentarian between the commander in chief and the chairman of the government.
Leonid Trotsky in his History of the Russian Revolution writes that the Kornilov rebellion was agreed with Kerensky and aimed at establishing the dictatorship of the latter, but Kornilov changed the arrangements and tried to achieve the dictatorship for himself.
See also
- Kazan catastrophe (1917)
- Bykhov seat
- The struggle for power in Russia in 1917
- August putsch (1991)
Notes
- ↑ “Kornilov’s“ affair “,“ speech “,“ conspiracy “,“ rebellion “- these are the terms in which the tragic events of the end of August connected with the name of Kornilov were defined. However, the situation, by its nature, was incomparably more complicated and, capturing the wide circles of the Russian public, cannot be squeezed into the narrow framework of such definitions. It is much more correct to call these events the Kornilov movement, leaving behind the act that took place on August 27-31 the name of the Kornilov speech ” - Denikin A. I. ESSAYS OF THE RUSSIAN TROUBLE. [In 3 book.] Book 2, v.2. The fight of General Kornilov; t.3. White movement and struggle of the Volunteer Army - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - 736 p.: Ill. + incl. 16 s - (White Russia) - T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1891-5 (Book 2)
- Jump up “Kornilov speech”, and before that - “Kornilov movement” - A. G. Kavtaradze Notes // General A. I. Denikin Essays on the Russian Troubles. The fight of General Kornilov. August 1917 — April 1918 — Reproduction of a publication. Paris. 1922. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - M .: Nauka, 1991 .-- 376 p. - ISBN 5-02-008583-9
- ↑ Milyukov P.N. Liquidation of Kornilov’s speech. (Enemies about the Bolsheviks and the proletarian revolution.) MPK AQUAREL, 1991. According to the publication Revolution and Civil War in the descriptions of the White Guards. Compiled by S. A. Alekseev. In 5 volumes. State Publishing House, M. - L., 1926.
- ↑ Stalin Collected Works T.3; Stalin “Trotskyism or Leninism”: “After the July defeat between the Central Committee and Lenin, disagreement really arose on the question of the fate of the Soviets. It is known that Lenin, wishing to focus the party’s attention on the preparation of an uprising outside the Soviets, warned against being carried away by the Soviets, believing that the Soviets, which were defunct by the defenders, had already turned into an empty place. The Central Committee and the Sixth Party Congress took a more cautious line, deciding that there was no reason to consider the revival of the Soviets ruled out. Kornilov’s speech showed that the decision was correct. However, this disagreement was not relevant for the party. Subsequently, Lenin admitted that the line of the Sixth Congress was correct. Interestingly, Trotsky did not cling to this disagreement and did not inflate it to "monstrous" sizes. "
- ↑ Zimina V.D. White matter of rebellious Russia: Political regimes of the Civil War. 1917-1920 M .: ROS. humanity. Univ., 2006.467 s. (Ser. History and memory). ISBN 5-7281-0806-7
- ↑ 1 2 3 St. Petersburg Encyclopedia
- ↑ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Tsvetkov V. Zh. Lavr Georgievich Kornilov.
- ↑ General A.I. Denikin Essays on Russian Troubles. The collapse of power and the army, February — September 1917 Reproduction of the publication. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - Publishing house "Science", 1991. - ISBN 5-02-008582-0
- ↑ GA of the Russian Federation. F. 5881. Op. 2. D. 608a. LL 30-31; Savinkov B.V. Decree. Op. with. 9.
- ↑ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Viktor Chernov The Great Russian Revolution. Memoirs of the Chairman of the Constituent Assembly. 1905-1920
- ↑ www.school.edu.ru :: Kornilov rebellion. August 25-31, 1917. Radiogram of A. F. Kerensky addressing the people. August 27, 1917 (unavailable link) . Date of treatment February 12, 2008. Archived October 23, 2008.
- ↑ Shambarov V.E. Belogvardeyshchina. - M.: EKSMO, Algorithm, 2007. (History of Russia. Modern view). ISBN 978-5-9265-0354-5 , p. 39
- ↑ Savich N.V. Memoirs, St. Petersburg, 1993, p. 249-250.
- ↑ Loginov. One step from the abyss (inaccessible link) . Date of treatment May 4, 2019. Archived on October 28, 2012.
- ↑ General A.I. Denikin Essays on Russian Troubles. The fight of General Kornilov. August 1917 — April 1918 — Reproduction of a publication. Paris. 1922. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - M .: Nauka, 1991 .-- 376 s - ISBN 5-02-008583-9 , p. 14, 98
- ↑ General A.I. Denikin Essays on Russian Troubles. The fight of General Kornilov. August 1917 — April 1918 — Reproduction of a publication. Paris. 1922. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - M .: Nauka, 1991 .-- 376 s - ISBN 5-02-008583-9 , p. 98
- ↑ General A.I. Denikin Essays on Russian Troubles. The fight of General Kornilov. August 1917 — April 1918 — Reproduction of a publication. Paris. 1922. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - M .: Nauka, 1991 .-- 376 s - ISBN 5-02-008583-9 , p. 15
- ↑ Tsvetkov V. Zh. “Lavr Georgievich Kornilov”
- ↑ 1 2 3 4 5 Chernov, V. Russian Revolution. Memoirs of the Chairman of the Constituent Assembly. (inaccessible link)
- ↑ 1 2 Rabinovich, A. The Rise of Kornilov
- ↑ Denikin A.I. Savinkov. “To the Kornilov case.” (Essays on Russian Troubles) - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T. 2, 3. - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 . - S. 21-22.
- ↑ Denikin A.I. Essays on Russian Troubles
- ↑ Ushakov, A.I., Fedyuk, V.P. Lavr Kornilov. - M .: Mol. Guard, 2006 .-- 398 p. - (The life of wonderful people). - 5,000 copies. - ISBN 5-235-02836-8 .
- ↑ Essays on Russian Troubles.
- ↑ Denikin A.I. Essays on Russian Troubles. - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T. 2, 3. - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 . - S. 53.
- ↑ 1 2 3 Kerensky, A.F. Russia on a historical turn
- ↑ Denikin, A.I. Essays on Russian Troubles. The collapse of power and the army, February — September 1917 . - M .: Nauka, 1991 .-- ISBN 5-02-008582-0 . - S. 466.
- ↑ Russian archive. - T. VIII. - M., 1998 .-- S. 148.
- ↑ Fomin, S.V. The Golden Blade of the Empire // Count Keller. - M .: Sowing, 2007 .-- ISBN 5-85824-170-0 . - S. 516.
- ↑ http://bi.narod.ru/900.docx .
- ↑ Denikin A.I. SKETCHES OF RUSSIAN TROUBLE. - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 , p. 57
- ↑ Trotsky L. D. History of the Russian Revolution. RISE OF KORNILOV unopened (inaccessible link) . Date of treatment June 19, 2008. Archived March 21, 2008.
- ↑ Denikin A.I. SKETCHES OF RUSSIAN TROUBLE. - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 , p. 73
- ↑ A. Lukomsky, p. 122
- ↑ Denikin A.I. SKETCHES OF RUSSIAN TROUBLE. - M .: Iris-press, 2006.- T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 , p. 77.
- ↑ Denikin A.I. SKETCHES OF RUSSIAN TROUBLE. - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 , p. 66
- ↑ Shambarov V.E. Belogvardeyshchina. - M.: EKSMO, Algorithm, 2007. (History of Russia. Modern view). ISBN 978-5-9265-0354-5 , p. 42
- ↑ Denikin A.I. SKETCHES OF RUSSIAN TROUBLE. - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 , p. 67
- ↑ Kostin A. L. Sown the wind - reaped the storm. - M .: Helios ARV, 2004 .-- 224 p., Ill. ISBN 5-85438-111-7 , p. 40
- ↑ Melgunov S.P. How the Bolsheviks seized power.// How the Bolsheviks seized power. The Golden German Key to the Bolshevik Revolution / S. P. Melgunov; foreword Yu. N. Emelyanova. - M.: Iris Press, 2007 .-- S. 48. - 640 p. + paste 16 s. - (White Russia). - ISBN 978-5-8112-2904-8
- ↑ Denikin A.I. Essays on Russian Troubles. - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - T. 2, 3. - S. 85. - ISBN 5-8112-1890-7 .
- ↑ Trotsky L. D. History of the Russian Revolution Archival copy of March 21, 2008 on the Wayback Machine .
- ↑ Kenes P. Red attack, white resistance. 1917-1918 / Per. from English K.A. Nikiforova. - M .: CJSC Centerpolygraph, 2007. - P. 39. - (Russia at a turning point in history). - ISBN 978-5-9524-2748-8 .
- ↑ Lenin V.I. On the heroes of forgery and the mistakes of the Bolsheviks // PSS. - T. 34 .-- S. 250.
- ↑ Melgunov S.P. How the Bolsheviks seized power. // How the Bolsheviks seized power. The Golden German Key to the Bolshevik Revolution / S. P. Melgunov; foreword Yu. N. Emelyanova. - M .: Iris-press, 2007 .-- S. 50 .-- 640 p. + paste 16 s. - (White Russia). - ISBN 978-5-8112-2904-8 .
- ↑ Melgunov S.P. How the Bolsheviks seized power.// How the Bolsheviks seized power. The Golden German Key to the Bolshevik Revolution / S. P. Melgunov; foreword Yu. N. Emelyanova. - M.: Iris Press, 2007 .-- S. 121 .-- 640 p. + paste 16 s. - (White Russia). - ISBN 978-5-8112-2904-8 .
- ↑ General from infantry .
Literature
- Historical research
- Tsvetkov V. Zh. "Lavr Georgievich Kornilov"
- S.V. Volkov . The tragedy of Russian officers
- Zimina V. D. White case of rebellious Russia: Political regimes of the Civil War. 1917-1920 M .: ROS. humanity. Univ., 2006.467 s. (Ser. History and memory). ISBN 5-7281-0806-7
- Melgunov, S. P. How the Bolsheviks seized power. The Golden German Key to the Bolshevik Revolution / S. P. Melgunov; Foreword by Yu. N. Emelyanov. - M .: Iris-press, 2007 .-- 640 s. + 16 s. - (White Russia). ISBN 978-5-8112-2904-8
- Volkova I. Russian army in Russian history. - M .: Yauza, Eksmo, 2005 .-- 640 p., Ill. ISBN 5-699-09557-8
- Kenes, Peter Red attack, white resistance. 1917-1918 / Per. from English K.A. Nikiforova. - M .: CJSC Centerpolygraph, 2007. - 287 s - (Russia at a turning point in history). ISBN 978-5-9524-2748-8
- Milyukov P.N. Liquidation of Kornilov’s speech. (Enemies about the Bolsheviks and the proletarian revolution.) MPK AQUAREL, 1991. According to the publication Revolution and Civil War in the descriptions of the White Guards. Compiled by S. A. Alekseev. In 5 volumes. State Publishing House, M. - L., 1926.
- Kostin A. L. Sown the wind - reaped the storm. - M .: Helios ARV, 2004 .-- 224 p., Ill. ISBN 5-85438-111-7
- Memoirs and Memoirs
- From the memories of the gene. A. Lukomsky. Archive of the Russian revolution. M., Terra, 1991. V.5, p. 101
- Memoirs of P.N. Krasnov. Archive of the Russian revolution. M., Terra, 1991. T.1-2.
- Denikin A.I. Essays on Russian Troubles. The collapse of power and the army, February — September 1917 Reproduction of the publication. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - Publishing house "Science", 1991. - ISBN 5-02-008582-0
- General A. I. Denikin Essays on Russian Troubles. The fight of General Kornilov. August 1917 — April 1918 — Reproduction of a publication. Paris. 1922. J. Povolozky & C, Editeurs. 13, rue Bonapartie, Paris (VI). - M .: Nauka, 1991 .-- 376 p. - ISBN 5-02-008583-9
- Kornilov L. G. Protocol of interrogation of L. G. Kornilov by the Extraordinary Commission 2-5 sept. 1917
- Kerensky A.F. Prelude to Bolshevism. 1919.
- AF Kerensky. The Prelude To Bolshevism The Kornilov Rising
- Reprint: Centerpolygraph. 2006.
- Denikin A. I. Sketches of the Russian Distemper. [In 3 book.] Book 2, v.2. The fight of General Kornilov; t.3. White movement and struggle of the Volunteer Army - M .: Iris-press, 2006. - 736 p.: Ill. + incl. 16 s - (White Russia) - T.2, 3 - ISBN 5-8112-1891-5 (Book 2)
- Trotsky L. D. History of the Russian Revolution in 3 volumes. - M .: terra, 1997.
- Trushnovich A. R. Memoirs of the Kornilovite : 1914-1934 / Comp. Ya.A. Trushnovich - Moscow-Frankfurt: Sowing, 2004 .-- 336 s, 8 ill. ISBN 5-85824-153-0
- Journalism
- Shambarov V.E. Invasion of strangers: conspiracy against the empire. M .: Algorithm , 2007. ISBN 978-5-9265-0473-3
- Shambarov V.E. Belogvardeyshchina . - M .: EKSMO, Algorithm, 2007. - 640 s - (History of Russia. Modern view). ISBN 978-5-9265-0354-5
- Starikov N.V. 1917. Not a revolution, but a special operation !. M .: Yauza, Eksmo, 2007. ISBN 978-5-699-24363-1
- Ivan Solonevich The Kornilov Conspiracy - Voice of Russia, No. 38, March 16, 1937
Links
- A. Denikin "Essays on Russian Troubles"
- Kornilov rebellion. August 25-31, 1917
- Radiogram A.F. Kerensky with an appeal to the people. August 27, 1917
- P. N. Milyukov History of the Russian Revolution
- A.F. Kerensky. Russia on a historical turn
- AF Kerensky. The Prelude To Bolshevism The Kornilov Rising
- Tsvetkov V. Zh. "Lavr Georgievich Kornilov".
- Sergey Eisenstein . Fragments from the movie "October" on the propaganda of the Wild Division by the Bolsheviks . Seventeen Moments in Soviet History (1927). Date of treatment February 15, 2011. Archived February 15, 2012.