P-29 ( Navy URAV index [note 1] - 4K75 , START code - RSM-40 , US and NATO defense code - SS-N-8 Sawfly , eng. Sawfly ) - a Soviet liquid two-stage ballistic missile of submarines. Designed by KB them. Makeeva . Adopted in March 1974 . As part of the missile system D-9 was located on 18 submarines of project 667B [1] . In March 1978, a modernized missile, designated R-29D, entered service. Complex D-9D were armed with 4 submarine missile project 667BD [2] . In accordance with Russian-American agreements on the reduction of strategic weapons in the 1990s, submarines of projects 667B and 667BD were withdrawn from the fleet, and R-29 missiles were withdrawn from service.
| R-29 | |
|---|---|
| URAF Navy Index - 4K75 START Code - RSM-40 US and NATO Defense Code - SS-N-8, Sawfly | |
Surface launch of the R-29 rocket | |
| Type of | submarine ballistic missile |
| Status | withdrawn from service |
| Developer | |
| Chief Designer | V.P. Makeev |
| Years of development | 1964 - 1974 |
| Test start | March 1969 |
| Adoption | March 12, 1974 |
| Manufacturer | ZMZ / KMZ |
| Years of operation | until the early 2000s |
| Main operators | |
| Modifications | R-29D R-29DU |
| β All specifications | |
Content
- 1 Development History
- 2 rocket design
- 3 Testing and operation
- 4 Modifications
- 4.1 R-29D missile complex D-9D
- 4.2 R-29DU missile of the D-9DU complex
- 5 Deployment
- 6 Decommissioning
- 7 Performance characteristics
- 8 Project Evaluation
- 9 See also
- 10 notes
- 11 References and sources
- 12 Literature
- 13 Links
Development History
The preliminary design of the R-29 rocket of the D-9 complex began in SKB-385 in July 1963 . The work was carried out as part of a competitive program by decision of the Commission on Military-Industrial Issues [3] . Two proposals were considered at the competition. As part of the development of the D-8 OKB-52 complex (general designer V.N. Chelomei ), it was proposed to deploy universal UR-100 missiles on sea carriers. Both submarines and special submersible launching platforms of the Skat project were considered as carriers for the complex [4] . SKB-385 (chief designer V.P. Makeev ) proposed the development of a specialized small-sized two-stage marine ballistic missile of the D-9 complex for arming submarines. The R-29 missile was developed with a three-fold increase in range and a one-and-a-half increase in casting weight compared to the R-27 missile [3] . The marine version of the UR-100 - UR-100MR missile due to the rearrangement of the steps was supposed to have smaller dimensions compared to the base missile. In terms of accuracy, throwing mass and firing range, competing missiles were approximately equal. The missile complex D-8 had a lower cost due to greater mass production. The missile of the D-9 complex had somewhat smaller dimensions [4] .
In 1964, a meeting of the Defense Council was held under the chairmanship of the First Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee, N. S. Khrushchev . Despite an interesting proposal and a vivid report by Chelomey, preference was given to the development of Makeevβs design bureau [5] . After this contest, OKB-52 no longer made proposals for sea-based ballistic missiles [6] . Decree of the Council of Ministers No. 808-33 on the commencement of work on the R-29 intercontinental boat rocket of the D-9 complex was issued on September 22, 1964 [7] .
SKB-385 was appointed the head developer of the rocket and the complex; VP P. Makeev, chief designer; OKB-2 was the developer of the first and second stage rocket engines ; A. Isaev , chief designer . The developer of the complex of onboard and ship systems for firing and missile flight control was NII-592 , chief designer N. Semikhatov , was appointed; NII- 885, chief designer N. A. Pilyugin , worked on the development of the on-board astrocorrection system; Project 701 works on the conversion of Project 658 submarine into the R-29 missile carrier - CPB "Wave" , chief designer Shulzhenko N. F. [7]
Rocket Design
The R-29 missile is made in a two-stage scheme with a detachable monoblock warhead. In the design of the rocket, solutions for the R-27 rocket found further application - an all-welded body of wafer shells from AMg-6, the absence of inter-tank and transition compartments, the location of the first and second stage propulsion systems inside the fuel tanks (βrecessed schemeβ), the amplification of fuel components , the use of a "dynamic" gas bell at startup.
The monoblock warhead with a nuclear charge of 1Mt had the shape of a cone with a spherical blunting in front. It was located in the fuel tank of the second stage and was installed in an βinvertedβ position relative to the direction of flight. The spherical conical instrument compartment with control equipment was located in the volume formed by the head fairing and the back of the warhead [8] . Separation of the stages was carried out using detonating elongated charges (DLES) and the energy of the gases of boosting tanks. The separation of the front compartment (combat and instrument) was carried out by means of remote sensing and air from the instrument compartment [3] . The 4D75 LRE of the first stage and 4D76 [9] [10] of the second stage of development of Isaev Design Bureau [7] consisted of a single-chamber marching engine and two single-chamber steering engines [8] . Liquid engines operated on self-igniting components - nitrogen tetraxide (AT) and asymmetric dimethylhydrazine (UDMH), with factory amplification.
To obtain the required firing accuracy, for the first time for a ballistic missile in the USSR, an azimuthal astrocorrection system (correction of the flight plane according to stellar landmarks) was used. Also, the on-board digital computer was first used [11] . As an alternative, the option of radio correction from the ground when shooting near its coasts was also considered [12] . For the first time, missile defense systems were also used. Light false targets with an effective scattering surface (EPR) corresponding to the EPR of the head were developed. When folded, they were placed in the fuel tank of the second stage in special cylindrical containers. The ejection of false targets was carried out during the separation of the warhead [7] .
Unlike the R-27, the rubber-shock absorber belts were transferred from the rocket to the walls of the rocket shaft and were used for several launches. Belts in the stowed position rested on a rocket in the area of ββthe bottoms. But during loading / unloading, they acted on the shell shells, so I had to increase the relative height of the fins of the βwaffleβ shells. To ensure unstressed rocket exit from the mine, the annular gap was increased to 150 millimeters [12] . The launch of the rocket could be carried out both in underwater and above water position. The intercontinental range of the new complex made it possible to transfer the areas of combat patrol of missile carriers to the seas adjacent to the territory of the USSR and located in the control zone of the Soviet Navy. If necessary, the launch of missiles could be carried out from the pier from the surface of the boat, located at the base [8] .
Project D67B submarine missile launchers received the D-9 complex. There were 12 missile silos on the boat. All missiles could be fired in one salvo at a submarine speed of up to 5 knots, from a depth of 50 meters and sea waves up to 6 points . Submarine retention at a given depth during salvo firing was carried out using annular clearance tanks and a special retention system. Despite the decrease in the number of missiles located on the submarine to 12 (compared with 16 missiles on the Project 667A boat) according to the calculations of the designers , by increasing the range, charge power and firing accuracy, the efficiency of the D-9 complex increased 2.5 times compared to complex D-5 [13] .
Testing and Operation
The first stage of testing the elements of the D-9 complex began on the Black Sea by launching full-scale mock-ups of rockets with the first stage rocket engine from the submerged PSD-9 floating bench. Starts were carried out from the surface of the stand and in the submerged state from a depth of 40-50 meters. 6 launches from underwater position and one of the surface [7] . September 23 [14] the first launch was carried out - from the underwater position of the stand. The start was unsuccessful. Due to premature engine shutdown, the model did not reach the calculated height and fell into the water. When you hit the water, the layout exploded. The toxic cloud was blown away by the wind towards the command post of the test, because of which the staff, wearing gas masks, was forced to leave the test area. The remaining 6 launches from the stand were considered successful. The second launch was made from the above-water position of the stand and confirmed the possibility of launching the R-29 missile from the above-water position [7] .
The second stage - flight tests from a ground bench - was carried out at the State Central Marine Landfill on the White Sea near the village of Nenoksa from March 1969 to November 1971 [7] [8] . In total, 20 missile launches were made. At one of the launches, the main engine, when it entered the mode, exploded in the mine. As a result of the fire, the launcher was destroyed and the tests had to be interrupted for many weeks.
The third stage of the tests was carried out on board the submarine. According to the decree of the Council of Ministers of December 22, 1964, TsKB-16 (now βMalachiteβ) was engaged in the development of project 701 - the conversion of a project 658 boat to the D-9 missile system. At the end of 1964, the Navy allocated a submarine K-145 . It was converted according to project 701 with the installation of six mines with launchers 4C-75-1. Mooring trials of the boat ended March 25, 1971 in the Northern Fleet. Tests from the side of the boat began on December 25, 1971. The launch was carried out from the White Sea from an overwater position, since an underwater launch was not possible due to ice conditions. The first launch and the next three were successful. With a preliminary boost of tanks during the fifth launch in March 1972, the destruction of the rocket and the mixing of fuel components began. The commander of K-145, captain of the 2nd rank, Y. Illarionov, ordered the immediate ascent and opening of the cover of the emergency mine. A rocket explosion occurred [7] . Repair was carried out until August 3, 1972 at the Northern Machine-Building Plant in Severodvinsk. The tests resumed launching on August 21, 1972 . There were no more accidents. The last launch was carried out on November 28, 1972 [15] . A total of 13 launches were made, of which two launches to the intercontinental range β along the Pacific Ocean [7] .
According to the same decree of September 22, 1964, the Malakhit Design Bureau was engaged in project 601 β the conversion of Project 629 diesel-electric submarine into a carrier for R-29 missiles (also with six missiles). Re-equipment of the K-118 boat of Project 629 was started at Zvyozdochka in 1968 [16] (due to a number of delays, the boat was only handed over to the Navy on December 28, 1976 [7] ). December 27, 1972 went into operation K-279 - the lead boat of project 667B [15] . In continuation of flight tests of the R-29 rocket, six launches were carried out from the K-279 and 13 with K-118. 13 single launches and two volleys were carried out - two and four-rocket (volley fire was carried out from the K-279 [15] ). Three missiles were launched at full range - from a boat located in the White Sea on a training ground in the Pacific Ocean. Of the 19 launches, one ended in an accident. The tank of the first stage collapsed, an explosion occurred and the rocket was thrown out of the mine. The boat was repaired for three months [7] .
The D-9 complex with the R-29 missile was put into service on March 12, 1974 in accordance with the Decree of the Council of Ministers No. 177-67 [7] .
The D-9 missile system was commissioned by Project 667B submarines. In total, 18 submarines of this type were built. For projects 601 and 701, only one boat was converted. Modernization of other submarines of projects 629 and 658 was not carried out.
Modifications
R-29D missile of the D-9D complex
In 1972 and 1974, international treaties were signed to limit the deployment of missile defense systems . In this regard, in August 1976, a government decree on the modernization of the R-29 rocket was issued. The firing range was increased by 1200 km (15%) as a result of the withdrawal of anti-ballistic missile defense means. Also simplified rocket production technology. Four launches in the framework of joint flight tests were carried out from the end of 1976 to the beginning of 1977. The D-9D complex was put into service in March 1978 [17] .
The complex received part of the submarines of project 667B and four submarines of project 667BD "Murena-M" . On project 667BD submarine missile carriers, the number of mines was increased from 12 to 16. Since the upgrade did not affect the launch system, missiles could only be launched in two salvos - 12 missile and an additional 4 missile [13] .
R-29DU missile of the D-9DU complex
In June 1983, a government decree was issued on the development of a modernized version with a combat unit of increased mass and power. During flight tests, 12 launches were carried out. Additionally, improvements were made to the mathematical support of the complex for new rocket parameters. In June 1986, by a government decree, the D-9DU complex was adopted [18] .
Deployment
The deployment of ballistic missile launchers R-29 and R-29D [19] . Data shown at year end.
| Year | Project 667Π | Project 667ΠΠ |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 12 | |
| 1973 | 36 | |
| 1974 | 96 | |
| 1975 | 158 | 64 |
| 1976 | 192 | 64 |
| 1977-1991 | 216 | 64 |
| 1992 | 204 [20] | 64 |
| 1993 | 204 | 64 |
| 1994 | 192 | 64 |
| 1995 | 144 | 64 |
| 1996 | 144 | 48 |
| 1997 | ? | ? |
| 1998 | 48 | ? |
| 1999 | 24 | 0 |
| 2000 | 24 | |
| 2001 | 24 | |
| 2002 | 24 | |
| 2003 | 24 | |
| 2004 | 0 |
Withdrawal
Under the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, Project 667B and 667BD boats were withdrawn from the fleet without cutting out the missile compartment. Phased decommissioning of Project 667B boats began in 1994 [1] . By the end of 1997, only 4 missile carriers remained in service - K-447 and K-457 at the SF, K-500 and K-530 at the Pacific Fleet. K-457 and K-530 were withdrawn from the fleet in 1999. The last of March 5, 2004 was decommissioned K-447 "Kislovodsk" [21] . The first boat of project 667BD was withdrawn from the fleet in 1996. In 1999, the last ship of this type left the system [2] .
In connection with the cancellation of all carriers, the R-29 rocket was also withdrawn from service. In total, during the operation of the D-9 complex of all modifications, 368 launches were made of which 322 were considered successful [22] .
Performance Specifications
| P-29 [11] | R-29D [11] | |
|---|---|---|
| Navy URAV Index | 4K75 | |
| START Code | RSM-40 | |
| US and NATO Defense Code | SS-N-8 mod 1 Sawfly | SS-N-8 mod 2 Sawfly |
| Complex | D-9 | D-9D |
| Carrier | SSBN project 667B 12 rockets | SSBN project 667 database 16 rockets |
| Basic data | ||
| Maximum range, km | 7800 | 9100 |
| Number of steps | 2 | |
| Rocket mass, kg | 33300 | |
| Length m | 13 | |
| Diameter m | 1.8 | |
| Warhead weight, kg | 1100 | |
| Type GF | nuclear monoblock | |
| Power, MT | one | 0.8 |
| Control system | ANN + astro correction | |
| KVO, km | 1,5 | 0.9 |
| First stage engine | 4D75 LRE (KBHM) | |
| Fuel | UDMH + AT | |
| Second stage engine | LRE 4D76 (KBHM) | |
| Fuel | UDMH + AT | |
| Start type | wet, underwater / surface | |
| Story | ||
| Developer | SKB-385 (GREC named after Makeev) | |
| Constructor | Makeev V.P. | |
| Development start | September 28, 1964 | August 1976 |
| Throw Layout Starts | - | |
| Total starts | 7 | - |
| Flight design tests | ||
| Starts from the stand | March 1969-December 1971 | |
| Total starts | twenty | - |
| Of which are successful | 10 | |
| Starts with submarines | December 15, 1971 -November 1972 | |
| Total starts | 19 | 3? |
| Of which are successful | ||
| Adoption | March 12, 1974 | March 1978 |
| Manufacturer | Zlatoust Engineering Plant Krasnoyarsk Engineering Plant | |
| Starts during operation | 368 | |
| Of them successful | 322 | |
Project Evaluation
The adoption of the R-29 missiles in 1974 made it possible to sharply increase the combat stability of Soviet missile carriers. The intercontinental range of the new missiles eliminated the need to overcome the anti-submarine borders of the NATO and US fleets. Project 667B submarines could carry out combat patrols in the marginal seas of the USSR - the Barents, White, Kara, Norwegian, Okhotsk, Japanese and in the ice-covered areas of the Arctic. This allowed the creation of the so-called "protected combat areas." These areas were defended by minefields [23] , in which multipurpose nuclear submarines, surface ships and aircraft carried military service. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π°Π΄ΡΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.
ΠΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Ρ Π -29 ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ β ΡΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ±Ρ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ°, Π²ΡΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π»ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ΅Ρ [24] . ΠΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π² ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π»ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π΄Ρ [23] .
However, even before the adoption of the R-29, in 1970 the United States adopted the Poseidon S-3 missile with a multiple warhead with individual guidance units . Equipping US missiles with multiple warheads dramatically increased the effectiveness of US strategic nuclear forces by increasing the number of warheads [24] .
At the same time, the American missile did not have an intercontinental range. Therefore, despite the difference in approaches, the goal of further development of marine ballistic missiles in the USSR and the USA has become the same - the creation of missiles with separated warheads and intercontinental firing range.
| TTX | Polaris A1 | Polaris A2 | Polaris A3 | P-27 | R-27U | Poseidon C3 | R-29 | M1 | M20 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A country | |||||||||||
| Year of adoption | 1960 | 1962 | 1964 | 1968 | 1974 | 1970 | 1974 | 1972 | 1976 | ||
| Maximum range, km | 2200 | 2800 | 4600 | 2500 | 3000 | 2500 | 4600 | 7800 | 3000 | 3200 | |
| The thrown weight, kg | 500 | 500 | 760 | 650 | 650 | > 650 | 2000 | 1100 | 1360 | 1000 | |
| Type of head | monoblock | RGCh RT | monoblock | RGCh RT | RGCH IN | monoblock | |||||
| Power, ct | 600 | 800 | 3 Γ 200 | 1000 | 1000 | 3 Γ 200 | 10 Γ 50 | 1000 | 500 | 1200 | |
| KVO , m | 1800 | 1000 | 1900 | 1300-1800 | 800 | 1500 | 1000 | ||||
| Starting weight, t | 12.7 | 13.6 | 16,2 | 14.2 | 29.5 | 33.3 | twenty | ||||
| Length m | 8.53 | 9.45 | 9.86 | 9.65 | 10.36 | 13 | 10.67 | ||||
| Diameter m | 1.37 | 1,5 | 1.88 | 1.8 | 1.49 | ||||||
| Number of steps | 2 | one | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| engine's type | Solid propellant rocket engine | Rocket engine | Solid propellant rocket engine | Rocket engine | Solid propellant rocket engine | ||||||
| Start type | dry | wet | dry | wet | dry | ||||||
See also
- Submarine Ballistic Missiles
- R-27 - predecessor of the R-29 rocket
- R-29R - successor to the R-29 rocket
Notes
- β Navy Missile and Artillery Management
References and sources
- β 1 2 Submarines of project 667B . www.deepstorm.ru. Date of treatment January 17, 2010.
- β 1 2 Submarines of project 667BD . www.deepstorm.ru. Date of treatment January 17, 2010.
- β 1 2 3 SKB-385, engineering design bureau, State Regional Center βDesign Bureau named after Academician V. P. Makeev "/ under the total. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - M .: State Rocket Center "Design Bureau named. Academician V.P. Makeev "; Military Parade LLC, 2007. - P. 90. - ISBN 5-902975-10-7 .
- β 1 2 SKB-385 / under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - 2007 .-- S. 92.
- β Khrushchev, explaining such a decision, jokingly said, βSee how the pioneers grew upβ; explaining that before the war at the aviation plant in Fili, the young Viktor Makeev tied a pioneer tie to the Secretary of the Moscow city committee Khrushchev
- β SKB-385 / under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - 2007 .-- S. 93.
- β 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Shirokorad A. B. Encyclopedia of Russian Missile Weapons / Ed. ed. A.E. Taras . - M .: AST , 2003 .-- S. 518. - ISBN 5-170-11177-0 .
- β 1 2 3 4 Collective of authors. Strategic nuclear weapons of Russia / edited by P. L. Podvig. - M .: IzdAT, 1998 .-- S. 280.
- β Ground testing of jet propulsion systems and thermal vacuum tests of spacecraft . Date of treatment December 4, 2009.
- β typo in the source - for R-29 (RSM-40) with the beginning of development in 1964 the designation RSM-54 is indicated
- β 1 2 3 Strategic nuclear weapons of Russia. - 1998 .-- S. 281.
- β 1 2 SKB-385 / under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - 2007 .-- S. 91.
- β 1 2 Shirokorad A. B. Encyclopedia of the Russian Federation. - S. 520.
- β The year is not indicated in the source. Apparently 1968
- β 1 2 3 Ballistic missile of submarines R-29 (RSM-40) . Information system "Missile Technology" . Date of treatment December 3, 2009. Archived January 28, 2012.
- β Korshunov Yu. L., Kutovoy E. M. Ballistic missiles of the Russian fleet. - St. Petersburg: Gangut, 2002 .-- S. 27 .-- 41 p. - (The Gangut Library). - 1200 copies. - ISBN 5-85875-043-5 .
- β SKB-385 / under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - 2007 .-- S. 94.
- β SKB-385 / under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - 2007 .-- S. 95.
- β Strategic nuclear weapons of Russia. - 1998 .-- S. 210-211.
- β The first boat of the project was launched in 1992. Project 667-B "Moray" Delta-I class (inaccessible link - history ) . www.atrinaflot.narod.ru. Date of treatment January 17, 2010.
- β K-447 Kislovodsk, project 667B . www.deepstorm.ru. Date of treatment January 17, 2010.
- β SKB-385 / under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - 2007 .-- S. 165.
- β 1 2 Strategic nuclear weapons of Russia. - 1998 .-- S. 208.
- β 1 2 Yu. V. Vedernikov. Chapter 2. A comparative analysis of the creation and development of the Marine Strategic Nuclear Forces of the USSR and the USA // A comparative analysis of the creation and development of the Marine Strategic Nuclear Forces of the USSR and the USA .
Literature
- Korshunov Yu. L., Kutovoy E. M. Ballistic missiles of the Russian fleet. - St. Petersburg: Gangut, 2002 .-- 41 p. - (The Gangut Library). - 1200 copies. - ISBN 5-85875-043-5 .
- Shirokorad A. B. Encyclopedia of Domestic Missile Weapons / Ed. ed. A.E. Taras . - M .: AST , 2003 .-- 515 p. - ISBN 5-170-11177-0 .
- SKB-385, Design Bureau of Engineering, GRTS "Design Bureau named after Academician V. P. Makeev "/ Compiled by Kanin R. N., Tikhonov N. N .; under the general. ed. V. G. Degtyar. - M .: State Rocket Center "Design Bureau named. Academician V.P. Makeev "; LLC Military Parade, 2007. - 408 p. - ISBN 5-902975-10-7 .
Links
- "The main stages of the development of marine strategic systems" (Inaccessible link - history ) . Date of treatment January 17, 2010.
- Ballistic missile of submarines R-29 (RSM-40) . www.new-factoria.ru. Date of treatment January 17, 2010. Archived January 28, 2012.