Clever Geek Handbook
📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

Infrared divergence

Infrared divergence (infrared catastrophe) - a situation of allegedly emitting an infinitely large number of photons with infinitesimal energies in a collision of two charged particles or with a sharp change in the speed of a charged particle. It is a consequence of the divergence of the integral due to the contributions of objects with very low energy (almost equal to zero), or the same thing, due to the physical phenomenon on very large scales.

Infrared divergence is available only in theories with massless particles (such as photons ). These divergences are an effect that a full theory often implies. One way to deal with it is to apply circumcision .

Content

Paradox Description

Process sectiondσ {\ displaystyle d \ sigma}   scattering of charged particles with the emission of one additional photon is expressed by the formula:dσ=dσ0dIω {\ displaystyle d \ sigma = d \ sigma _ {0} {\ frac {dI} {\ omega}}}   . Heredσ0 {\ displaystyle d \ sigma _ {0}}   - cross section of the scattering process of charged particles with the emission of a certain number of photons,dI {\ displaystyle dI}   - total radiation energy ,ω {\ displaystyle \ omega}   - radiation frequency. When integrating this formula over frequencies in a certain finite interval fromωone {\ displaystyle \ omega _ {1}}   beforeω2 {\ displaystyle \ omega _ {2}}   it turns outdσ∼αln⁡ω2ωonedσu {\ displaystyle d \ sigma \ sim \ alpha \ ln {\ frac {\ omega _ {2}} {\ omega _ {1}}} d \ sigma _ {u}}   wheredσu {\ displaystyle d \ sigma _ {u}}   - scattering cross section of the elastic process. We can approximately assume thatω2 {\ displaystyle \ omega _ {2}}   approximately equal to the initial energy of the radiating particle. But the magnitudeωone {\ displaystyle \ omega _ {1}}   can be made arbitrarily close to zero. As a result, the radiation cross section of all possible soft photons tends to infinity. [one]

With another method of calculating the average number of photons with a sharp change in the speed of a charged particle:n¯∼ln⁡Lλ {\ displaystyle {\ bar {n}} \ sim \ ln {\ frac {L} {\ lambda}}}   whereL,λ {\ displaystyle L, \ lambda}   - maximum and minimum integration frequencies. Atλ→0 {\ displaystyle \ lambda \ rightarrow 0}   we get thatn¯→∞ {\ displaystyle {\ bar {n}} \ rightarrow \ infty}   so that infinitely many photons of zero frequency are always emitted. [2]

Paradox explanation

The average number of emitted photonsdn¯=dIω {\ displaystyle d {\ bar {n}} = {\ frac {dI} {\ omega}}}   wheredI {\ displaystyle dI}   - classical radiation intensity,ω {\ displaystyle \ omega}   - radiation frequency. Integrating this formula we get:n¯=∫ωoneω2dIω {\ displaystyle {\ bar {n}} = \ int _ {\ omega _ {1}} ^ {\ omega _ {2}} {\ frac {dI} {\ omega}}}   . Since soft photons are emitted statistically independently, the probabilityω(n) {\ displaystyle \ omega (n)}   radiationn¯ {\ displaystyle {\ bar {n}}}   photons is expressed in terms of their average number by the Poisson formulaω(n)=n¯nn!exp⁡(-n¯) {\ displaystyle \ omega (n) = {\ frac {{\ bar {n}} ^ {n}} {n!}} \ exp (- {\ bar {n}})}   . The cross section of the scattering process with photon emission can be represented as:dσ=dσuω(n) {\ displaystyle d \ sigma = d \ sigma _ {u} \ omega (n)}   . Insofar as∑ω(n)=one {\ displaystyle \ sum \ omega (n) = 1}   thendσu {\ displaystyle d \ sigma _ {u}}   represents the total scattering cross section, accompanied by any soft radiation. The cross section for purely elastic scattering is actually zero. Atωone→0 {\ displaystyle \ omega _ {1} \ to 0}   average numbern¯→∞ {\ displaystyle {\ bar {n}} \ to \ infty}   and according to the Poisson formula, the probability of emission of any finite number of photons vanishes. [one]

The physical cause of the paradox is the assumption of an infinite radius of the Coulomb field , which leads to the inadequacy of the photon picture for very large wavelengths. To fulfill the conditionn¯>one {\ displaystyle {\ bar {n}}> 1}   wavelengths must be longereoneαℏmc {\ displaystyle e ^ {\ frac {1} {\ alpha}} {\ frac {\ hbar} {mc}}}   , which is significantly larger than the radius of the observed part of the universe. Thus, this paradox has a purely theoretical significance [2]

See also

  • Renormalization
  • Renormalization group
  • UV Divergence

Notes

  1. ↑ 1 2 V. B. Berestetskii , E. M. Lifshits , L. P. Pitaevsky Quantum electrodynamics. - M., Fizmatlit, 2001. - c. 482-488
  2. ↑ 1 2 Walter E. Thirring. Principles of quantum electrodynamics. - M., Higher School, 1964. - p. 105-109

Literature

  • Kaku, Michio. Quantum Field Theory: A Modern Introduction. - New York: Oxford University Press, 1993 .-- ISBN 0-19-507652-4 .
  • Claude Itzykson, Jean-Bernard Zuber. Quantum Field Theory. - McGraw-Hill , 1980 .-- P. 172/3. - ISBN 0-07-032071-3 .
Source - https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infrared_dispersion&oldid=101404407


More articles:

  • Hear
  • Jungle Book (Anime)
  • Elizabeth (Mordovia)
  • Madou King Grandzort
  • Polivanova, Katerina Nikolaevna
  • Bolotovo (Galich district)
  • O'Connor Pat
  • New Christians
  • Stevens, Rachel
  • Konovalov, Anatoly Mikhailovich

All articles

Clever Geek | 2019