Clever Geek Handbook
📜 ⬆️ ⬇️

Item order

The order of an element in group theory is the smallest positive integerm {\ displaystyle m} m such thatm {\ displaystyle m} m multiple group multiplication of this elementg∈G {\ displaystyle g \ in G} g \ in G gives itself a neutral element :

gg...g⏟m=gm=e{\ displaystyle \ underbrace {gg \ dots g} _ {m} = g ^ {m} = e} \ underbrace {gg \ dots g} _ {{m}} = g ^ {m} = e .

In other words,m {\ displaystyle m} m - the number of different elements of the cyclic subgroup generated by this element. If suchm {\ displaystyle m} m does not exist (or, equivalently, the number of elements of a cyclic subgroup is infinite), then they say thatg {\ displaystyle g} g has an infinite order. Designated asord(g) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (g)} {\ mathrm {ord}} (g) or|g| {\ displaystyle | g |} | g | .

Studying the orders of the elements of a group can give information about its structure. Several deep questions about the relationship between the order of the elements and the order of the group are contained in various Burnside problems , some of which remain open.

Content

Key Features

The order of an element is unity if and only if the element is neutral .

If every non-neutral element inG {\ displaystyle G}   matches its inverse (i.e.g2=e {\ displaystyle g ^ {2} = e}   ) thenord(a)=2 {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (a) = 2}   andG {\ displaystyle G}   is abelian becauseab=(ab)-one=b-onea-one=ba {\ displaystyle ab = (ab) ^ {- 1} = b ^ {- 1} a ^ {- 1} = ba}   . The converse is not true in the general case: for example, a (additive) cyclic groupZ6 {\ displaystyle \ mathbb {Z} _ {6}}   integers modulo 6 is Abelian, but the number 2 is of order 3:

2+2+2=6≡0(mod6){\ displaystyle 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 \ equiv 0 {\ pmod {6}}}   .

For any wholek {\ displaystyle k}   identitygk=e {\ displaystyle g ^ {k} = e}   performed if and only iford(g) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (g)}   dividesk {\ displaystyle k}   .

All degrees of an element of infinite order are also of infinite order. If ag {\ displaystyle g}   has finite order then ordergk {\ displaystyle g ^ {k}}   equal to the orderg {\ displaystyle g}   divided by the largest common divisor of numbersord(g) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (g)}   andk {\ displaystyle k}   . The order of the inverse element coincides with the order of the element itself (ord(g)=ord(g-one) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (g) = \ mathrm {ord} (g ^ {- 1})}   )

Link to Group Order

The order of any group element divides the order of the group . For example, in a symmetric groupS3 {\ displaystyle S_ {3}}   consisting of six elements, a neutral elemente {\ displaystyle e}   has (by definition) order 1, three elements that are roots ofe {\ displaystyle e}   - order 2, and order 3 have the two remaining elements that are the roots of elements of order 2: that is, all orders of elements are divisors of the order of the group.

Partially the converse is true for finite groups ( Cauchy-group theorem ): if a primep {\ displaystyle p}   divides the order of the groupG {\ displaystyle G}   , then there is an elementg∈G {\ displaystyle g \ in G}   , for whichord(g)=p {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (g) = p}   . The statement does not hold for composite orders, so the Klein quadruple group does not contain an element of order four.

Work Order

In any groupord(ab)=ord(ba) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (ab) = \ mathrm {ord} (ba)}   .

There is no general formula relating the order of the productab {\ displaystyle ab}   with orders of factorsa {\ displaystyle a}   andb {\ displaystyle b}   . The case is possible when anda {\ displaystyle a}   , andb {\ displaystyle b}   have finite orders, while the order of the productab {\ displaystyle ab}   endless, it is also possible thata {\ displaystyle a}   , andb {\ displaystyle b}   have infinite order whileord(ab) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (ab)}   is finite. An example of the first case is that in a symmetric group over integer permutations given by formulasa(x)=2-x,b(x)=one-x {\ displaystyle a (x) = 2-x, b (x) = 1-x}   thenab(x)=x-one {\ displaystyle ab (x) = x-1}   . An example of the second case - permutations in the same groupa(x)=x+one,b(x)=x-one {\ displaystyle a (x) = x + 1, b (x) = x-1}   whose product is a neutral element (permutationab(x)=id {\ displaystyle ab (x) = \ mathrm {id}}   leaving the elements in place). If aab=ba {\ displaystyle ab = ba}   it can be argued thatord(ab) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (ab)}   divides the least common multiple of numbersord(a) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (a)}   andord(b) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (b)}   . A consequence of this fact is that in a finite abelian group, the order of any element divides the maximum order of elements in the group.

Counting in the order of elements

For this final groupG {\ displaystyle G}   of ordern {\ displaystyle n}   , the number of elements with orderd {\ displaystyle d}   (d {\ displaystyle d}   - dividern {\ displaystyle n}   ) multipleφ(d) {\ displaystyle \ varphi (d)}   whereφ {\ displaystyle \ varphi}   - Euler function giving the number of positive numbers not exceedingd {\ displaystyle d}   and mutually simple with him. For example, in the caseS3 {\ displaystyle S_ {3}}  φ(3)=2 {\ displaystyle \ varphi (3) = 2}   , and there are exactly two elements of order 3; however, this statement does not provide any useful information regarding elements of order 2, sinceφ(2)=one {\ displaystyle \ varphi (2) = 1}   , and very limited information on compound numbers such asd=6 {\ displaystyle d = 6}   , insofar asφ(6)=2 {\ displaystyle \ varphi (6) = 2}   , and in the groupS3 {\ displaystyle S_ {3}}   there are zero elements of order 6.

Connection with homomorphisms

Group homomorphisms tend to lower the order of elements. If af:G→H {\ displaystyle f: G \ to H}   is a homomorphism, andg∈G {\ displaystyle g \ in G}   Is an element of finite order, thenord(f(g)) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (f (g))}   dividesord(g) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (g)}   . If af {\ displaystyle f}   injectively thenord(f(g))=ord(g) {\ displaystyle \ mathrm {ord} (f (g)) = \ mathrm {ord} (g)}   . This fact can be used to prove the absence of (injective) homomorphism between any two given groups. (For example, there is no nontrivial homomorphismh:S3→Zfive {\ displaystyle h: S_ {3} \ to \ mathbb {Z} _ {5}}   , since any number, except zero, inZfive {\ displaystyle \ mathbb {Z} _ {5}}   has an order of 5, and 5 does not divide any of the orders of 1, 2 and 3 elementsS3 {\ displaystyle S_ {3}}   .) Another consequence is the assertion that conjugate elements are of the same order.

Literature

  • Kurosh A.G. Group theory. - Moscow: Nauka, 1967. - ISBN 5-8114-0616-9 .
  • Melnikov O. V., Remeslennikov V. N., Romankov V. A. Chapter II. Groups // General algebra / Under the general. ed. L.A. Skornyakova . - M .: Nauka , 1990. - T. 1. - S. 66-290. - 592 p. - (Reference Mathematical Library). - 30,000 copies. - ISBN 5-02-014426-6 .
Source - https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= Element_order&oldid = 95595821


More articles:

  • Carbondale (Station)
  • Orton, Jobe
  • Southern Possum
  • Dolinin, Alexey Georgievich
  • European Basketball Championship for girls under 18 years old 2014. Playoffs
  • Kokhreidze, Shalva Fedorovich
  • Rallys Dimitrios
  • Ruicheng
  • Ovchinnikov, Roman Konstantinovich
  • Smirnov, Nikolai Fedorovich (sapper)

All articles

Clever Geek | 2019