Clever Geek Handbook
πŸ“œ ⬆️ ⬇️

Distortion in the perception of the choice made

In cognitive science, a distortion in the perception of a choice is the tendency to retroactively attribute positive qualities to an object or action that a person has chosen. This is cognitive bias . What is remembered about the decision can be just as important as the decisions themselves, especially in determining how much regret or satisfaction a person experiences from the decision made. Studies show that the process of making and remembering choices produces memories that tend to be distorted in a predictable way. Thus, memories of the possibility of choice are distorted by the fact that positive aspects are usually attributed to the chosen option, if they were not originally part of it, and negative aspects, as a rule, are attributed to rejected options. [1] After the action has been completed, we can be biased in the ways in which we evaluate the effectiveness of our decisions. [2] It is believed that this may affect our future decision making. These errors can be saved in the form of memories that are stored in our conscious experience based on subjective qualities, our prior knowledge and beliefs, our motives and goals, and social context. True and false memories arise by the same mechanism, because when the brain processes and stores information, it cannot distinguish where it came from. [3]

General definition

The tendency to remember their decisions is better than they actually were, when people tend to attribute more positive traits to the opportunities that they have chosen, and negative traits to other options. [one]

Theory

Experiments in cognitive science and social psychology have revealed a wide range of deviations in areas such as statistical evidence, social attribution, and memory. [2] A memory distortion that supports choice is thought to occur during a memory search and results from the belief that β€œI chose this option, so it should be a better choice.” In addition, it is possible that the choice is auxiliary memories and arise when the individual only pays attention to certain information when making a decision or in post-election cognitive dissonance . [4] In addition, prejudices can also arise because they are closely related to high-level cognitive operations and complex social interactions. [5] The distortion of memory is sometimes intentional, because it may be in our interests not to remember some details about the event or to forget them altogether. [6]

Selection Circumstances

The purpose of the selection, as a rule, is to choose the best option. Thus, making a choice, a person is likely to believe that the chosen option was better than the rejected options. Each choice has positive and negative sides. The decision-making process relies heavily on previous experience. Thus, a person will remember not only the decision made, but also the rationale for making such a decision.

Motivation

Motivation can also play a role in this process, because when a person remembers the option that he has chosen as the best, this should help reduce regret about his choice. This can be a positive illusion that contributes to well-being.

Cases that a person does not control

There are cases when a person does not always control the choice made for himself. People often end up with options that were not chosen by them, but were assigned by others, for example, work assignments assigned by superiors, or places of rest chosen by other family members. [7] However, the choice, being assigned (by chance or not), brings to mind the experience, which, as a rule, stands for an alternative to the option not received, which may lead to regret and disappointment. [eight]

  • Assigned options : a choice made for you by other people in your interests may cause memory attributions that support that choice. [7] But current experiments do not show distortion in the perception of the choice made for the assigned options. Nevertheless, the choice that is made on behalf of a person in his interests, really shows a tendency to distort in the memory of the perception of choice.
  • Random option : people have no distortion in the perception of the choice made, when the choice is made randomly for them. [9] This is because the distortion in the perception of the choice made, as a rule, occurs during the act of making a decision.

Causes of distortion in the perception of the choice made

The understanding of the situation that people have is formed by memories of the choices they make; one university or job is selected, while other options are rejected. Recollections of the choice made, as well as rejected alternatives, can affect a person’s sense of well-being. Regretting the not accepted option can cast a shadow, while satisfaction with the right choice can make a good result. [ten]

Positive Illusions

Distortion in the perception of the choice made often leads to memories that portray the person in an overly favorable light. In general, cognitive prejudice weakens our grip in fact, because the line between reality and fantasy becomes blurred if the brain is not able to recall a specific event. Positive illusions are usually moderate and play an important role in our sense of well-being. However, we all need to know that they exist within the framework of human nature. [five]

Memory for data

Human beings are endowed with intelligence and a complex mind that allows us to remember our past, can optimize the present and make plans for the future. Remembering involves a complex interaction between the current environment that everyone expects to remember and what is preserved from the past. [5] The brain mechanisms that allow us to store and search data in memory serve us well most of the time, but sometimes they cause a person anxiety.

Changing memories over time

There is now much evidence that the contents of memory can go through systematic changes. After a period of time, if data stored in memory is often not used, it can be forgotten.

  • Preservation of memory : It is recognized that preservation is best for the experience that is pleasant, the experiences that are unpleasant and the experience that is neutral are less preserved, the worst preserved. Shared memories provide the basis for conclusions that may lead to distortion. These distortions do not appear in the memory in order to supplant specific memories of the individual, but rather they complement and fill in the gaps when the memories are lost. [11] It has been shown that a wide range of strategic and systematic processes are used to activate various areas of the brain in order to obtain information.
  • Reliability of memory : People are capable of self-testing memory, in which a person can consider the credibility of the extracted memory, asking himself whether this event is really possible. For example, if a person remembers that he saw a flying pig, he must conclude that it was in a dream, because pigs cannot fly in the real world. Memory does not provide people with perfect reproductions of what happened, it consists only of constructions and reconstructions of what happened. [3]

Areas of the brain that affect memory

There is ample evidence that the amygdala is involved in the effective effect on memory. [12] Emotional arousal, usually based on fright, activates the amygdala and modulates the accumulation of memory data, which occurs in other areas of the brain. The forebrain is one of the goals of the tonsil. The forebrain receives input from the amygdala and calculates the emotional value of the stimulus, forms an emotional response, and transfers it to the cerebral cortex . This can change the way neurons respond to future input of information, and cognitive prejudices, such as distortions in perceptions of choices made, that can influence future decisions.

Stress hormones affect memory

Effects associated with stress hormones, such as adrenaline and glucocorticoids , which mediate effects related to the tonsil. [12] This has been shown in experiments with rats, which, when given systemic adrenaline injections while being trained to complete a task, show improved memory during the task. In fact, the stronger the emotions that are tied to memory, the greater the likelihood that a person will remember these events. Thus, if the memory is stored and retrieved properly, it is less likely to be garbled.

Brain Mapping

PET or MRI can be used to identify various areas of the brain that are activated during a specific memory search.

MRI scan

  • True Against False Memories : In one study, subjects were asked to recall a series of events when their brain was monitored by MRI to see which areas would β€œlight up”. When a person remembers more true memories than false ones, a cluster is activated in the brain that encompasses the upper right temporal gyrus and lateral occipital cortex . However, when the opposite happened (when a person remembered more false memories than true ones), activation occurred in the area of ​​the brain where the left islet . [13] These results may provide some insight into which areas of the brain are involved in storing memories and then retrieving them.

Distortion in the perception of a choice increases with age.

Studies currently show that when people age, their search process in memory changes. Although memory problems in general are common to all because memory is not perfectly accurate, older people more often than young adults show a distortion in the perception of the choice made.

Brain Aging

Normal aging may be accompanied by peripheral neuropathy in the frontal areas of the brain. Frontal regions help people code or use specific attributes of memory to make initial judgments, control personality and ability to plan events. These areas include memory distortion and regulation of emotions.

Regulation of Emotion

In general, older adults are more likely to remember the emotional aspects of the situation than younger adults. For example, in a characteristic memory questionnaire, older people rated memories of events as having more connected thoughts and feelings than young adults did. As a person grows up, the regulation of their own emotions becomes a higher priority, while the acquisition of knowledge becomes a less powerful motive. Therefore, a distortion in the perception of the choice made arises because their attention was focused on how they felt about the choice, and not on the actual details of the choice. Studies have shown that when young adults are encouraged to recall the emotional aspect of choice, they are more likely to show a distortion in the perception of the choice made. This may be due to a greater tendency of older people to show a positive memory effect.

Hope to meet

Older people more than young people rely on unconditional or general knowledge about the event, so they may not recognize individual elements of the event. [1] Older people are also less likely to remember the contextual features of events, such as colors or location. This may be because older people remember (or rely on) fewer sources of identification characteristics than young people. Consequently, older people should more often think or base the answer on less specific information, for example, on acquaintance. [14] As a result, if they cannot remember something, they are likely to fill in the missing gaps with things that are familiar to them. [five]

Understanding the

Older people rely more on substantive search. A number of studies show that using stereotypes and general knowledge to help recall events is less cognitively demanding than using other types of memory information and thus may require less activity reflecting reality. This shift towards core-based processes can occur as compensation due to age-related impairment in verbal memory. [15]

Inhibition

Occasional memory and inhibition explain age-related increases in false memories. Inhibition of memory may be associated with a person’s hearing capacity and concentration. If a person cannot hear what is happening around him or does not pay much attention, the event in memory cannot be properly preserved and, therefore, cannot be accurately restored.

Examples of perception distortion

The choice between two used cars

Henkel and Maser investigated the role of beliefs at the time of recollection of the chosen option. They gave the participants several hypothetical options, such as choosing between two used cars. Participants selected several options, returned to the laboratory in a week. The researchers reminded them which options they had chosen and gave them a list of the features of the two options; some new positive and negative features of the options were mixed with old ones. Participants were then asked to indicate whether each option was new, was related to their choice, or was related to the option they rejected. At the same time, they gave one subject those options that they really chose, and the other half opposite. Participants approved the options that Henkel and Maser had told them and β€œremembered” them. At the same time, positive traits were more likely attributed to the chosen option and negative traits to the rejected option. These results show that beliefs at the time of extraction of the chosen option are formed by the characteristics of the choice and how vividly they are remembered, and a distortion in the perception of the choice made occurs when a person recalls his past choice. [four]

Remembering High School

One study shows accuracy and distortion in the memory of high school grades. The relationship between accuracy and distortion of the autobiographical content of the memory was examined by checking 3220 high school marks recalled by 99 college freshmen. It was shown that most of the errors are related to the overestimation of their grades by students, which means that these distortions relate to the reconstruction of memory in a positive and emotionally pleasing direction. In addition, their results show that the distortion process does not actually cause the loss of unpleasant memories of receiving a poor grade. [11] This is because no correlation was found between the percent accuracy of the memories and the degree of asymmetry, or distortion. This shows that distortions in the memory of high school grades occur after the content has been forgotten by another mechanism.

50 Year College Study

МногиС ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Π½Ρ‹Π΅ исслСдования Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹, Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€, ΠΏΡΡ‚ΡŒΠ΄Π΅ΡΡΡ‚ Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π½Π΅Π΅ исслСдованиС запоминания ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠ°. Π’ этом исслСдовании ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎ 54 Π»Π΅Ρ‚ послС окончания, 276 выпускников ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 3025 ΠΈΠ· 3967 ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠ°. ΠšΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ‰Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ошибок ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ с ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π²Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ удСрТивания ΠΈ Π»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΠ΅ студСнты сдСлали мСньшС ошибок. Π’ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΡ‚Π·Ρ‹Π²Π° ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡŒ с ΡƒΠ²Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π·Ρ‹Π²Π΅. Π’ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΌΡŒΠ΄Π΅ΡΡΡ‚ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ это Π·Π°Π²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ фактичСской ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ. ΠžΠΏΠΈΡ€Π°ΡΡΡŒ Π½Π° эти Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ искаТСния происходят вскорС послС окончания ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠ°, ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π² Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π²Π°Π»Π° хранСния Π² памяти, ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ большС для Π»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΡ… студСнтов, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ вспоминали ΠΈΡ… с ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, Π³Π΄Π΅-Ρ‚ΠΎ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° воспоминаниС Π² памяти хранится ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ врСмя спустя, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΡƒΡ‚ΡŒ искаТСниС. [sixteen]

Π”ΠΈΠ· - Π ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ³Π΅Ρ€ - ΠœΠ°ΠΊΠ”Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠΎΡ‚Ρ‚ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΠ°

Участник ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΠ»ΡƒΡˆΠΈΠ²Π°Π» экспСримСнтатора, Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ списки тСматичСски связанных слов (Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€, Ρ‚Π°Π±Π»ΠΈΡ†Π°, ΠΊΡƒΡˆΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°, Π»Π°ΠΌΠΏΠ°, стол), Π° Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ врСмя экспСримСнтатор ΡΠΏΡ€Π°ΡˆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ‚, Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ Π»ΠΈ слово прСдставлСно Π² спискС. Участники часто ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π°ΡŽΡ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ связанныС с Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ произнСсСнныС слова ( Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€, стул) Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π² сСрии, ΠΏΠΎ сущСству прСдполагая, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ "ΡΠ»Ρ‹ΡˆΠ°Π»ΠΈ", Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ экспСримСнтатор Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ» эти нСпрСдставлСнныС слова (ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ критичСскиС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΈ). ΠΠ΅ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Ρ‹ "Π΄Π°" Π½Π° критичСских ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΈ, часто относимыС ΠΊ Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ воспоминаниям, ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ высоки Π² стандартных условиях DRM. [17]

ΠžΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ диссонансу

ВСория ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ диссонанса ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ люди ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ для Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±Ρ‹ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ диссонанс. ИскаТСниС Π² восприятии сдСланного Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ связанноС с Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌ аспСктом ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ диссонанса, исслСдовал Π”ΠΆΠ΅ΠΊ Π‘Ρ€Π΅ΠΌ (1956), ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ послСвыборный диссонанс. Π’ контСкстС ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ диссонанса, искаТСниС Π² восприятии сдСланного Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π° Π±ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ сниТСниС ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ„Π»ΠΈΠΊΡ‚Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ "я ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°ΡŽ X" ΠΈ "Π― ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠΈΠ» Π² Y".

УстранСниС искаТСния

Π˜Π·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ эффСкта Π›Π΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠœΠ°ΠΊΠ±Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΎ сниТСниС искаТСния Π² восприятии сдСланного Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°, послС Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ участники ΠΏΠΎΠΌΡ‹Π»ΠΈ Ρ€ΡƒΠΊΠΈ. Π’ΠΎ Π΅ΡΡ‚ΡŒ с ΠΎΡ‡ΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ своих Ρ€ΡƒΠΊ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ избавлялись ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚ мыслСй ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ принятого Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. [18]

Notes

  1. ↑ 1 2 3 Mather, M., & Johnson, MK (2000). Choice-supportive source monitoring: Do our decisions seem better to us as we age? Psychology and Aging, 15, 596-606.
  2. ↑ 1 2 "But That's Crazy! Cognitive Bias in Decision-making | Duncan Pierce." Duncan Pierce | Duncanpierce.org. Web. 18 Sept. 2010. < http://duncanpierce.org/cognitive_bias_workshop Архивная копия ΠΎΡ‚ 22 фСвраля 2014 Π½Π° Wayback Machine >.
  3. ↑ 1 2 Johnson, Marcia K. "Memory and Reality." American Psychologist (2006): 760-71. Web. 18 Sept. 2010. Архивированная копия (Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡ€.) (нСдоступная ссылка) . Date of treatment August 20, 2010. Archived on August 20, 2010. .
  4. ↑ 1 2 "Memory Distortion in Decision Making." University of Southern California. Web. 18 Sept. 2010. < γ‚’γƒΌγ‚«γ‚€γƒ–γ•γ‚ŒγŸγ‚³γƒ”γƒΌ (Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡ€.) . Π”Π°Ρ‚Π° обращСния 8 ΠΌΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° 2008. Архивировано 11 ΠΌΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° 2015 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°. >.
  5. ↑ 1 2 3 4 Schacter, Daniel L. The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002. Print.
  6. ↑ Gordon, Ruthanna; Franklin, Nancy; Beck, Jennifer. Wishful Thinking and Source Monitoring (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Memory & Cognition : journal. - 2005. - Vol. 33 , no. 3 . β€” P. 418β€”429 . β€” DOI : 10.3758/BF03193060 .
  7. ↑ 1 2 Mather, M.; Shafir, E.; Johnson, M. Remembering chosen and assigned options (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Memory & Cognition : journal. - 2003. - Vol. 31 , no. 3 . β€” P. 422β€”433 . β€” DOI : 10.3758/BF03194400 .
  8. ↑ Stoll Benney, Kristen; Henkel, Linda. The Role of Free Choice in Memory for past Decisions (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Memory : journal. - 2006. - Vol. 14 , no. 8 . β€” P. 1001β€”1011 . β€” DOI : 10.1080/09658210601046163 .
  9. ↑ Henkel, LA; Mather, M. Memory attributions for choices: How beliefs shape our memories (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Journal of Memory and Language : journal. - 2007. - Vol. 57 , no. 2 . β€” P. 163β€”176 . β€” DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.012 . Архивировано 29 апрСля 2011 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°. Архивная копия ΠΎΡ‚ 29 апрСля 2011 Π½Π° Wayback Machine
  10. ↑ Mather, M.; Shafir, E.; Johnson, MK Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Psychological Science : journal. - 2000. - Vol. 11 , no. 2 . β€” P. 132β€”138 . β€” DOI : 10.1111/1467-9280.00228 . β€” PMID 11273420 .
  11. ↑ 1 2 Bahrick, Harry P.; Hall, Lynda K.; Berger, Stephanie A. Accuracy and Distortion in Memory for High School Grades (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Psychological Science : journal. - 1996. - Vol. 7 , no. 5 . β€” P. 265β€”271 . β€” DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00372.x .
  12. ↑ 1 2 McGaugh, James L.; Cahill, Larry; Roozendaal, Benno. Involvement of the Amygdala in Memory Storage: Interaction with Other Brain Systems (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America : journal. - 1996. - Vol. 93 , no. 24 . β€” P. 13508β€”13514 . β€” DOI : 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13508 .
  13. ↑ Baym, CL; Gonsalves, BD Comparison of neural activity that leads to true memories, false memories, and forgetting: An fMRI study of the misinformation effect (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci : journal. - 2010 .-- Vol. 10 , no. 3 . β€” P. 339β€”348 . β€” DOI : 10.3758/CABN.10.3.339 . β€” PMID 20805535 .
  14. ↑ Dodson, C.; Bawa, S.; Slotnick, S. Aging, source memory, and misrecollections (Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡ€.) // Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition. β€” 2007. β€” Π’. 33 . β€” Π‘. 169β€”181 . β€” DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.169 .
  15. ↑ Lovden, M. The episodic memory and inhibition accounts of age-related increases in false memories: A consistency check (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Journal of Memory and Language : journal. - 2003. - Vol. 49 , no. 2 . β€” P. 268β€”283 . β€” DOI : 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00069-X .
  16. ↑ Bahrick, HP; Hall, LK; Da Costa, LA Fifty years of memory of college grades: Accuracy and distortions (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Emotion : journal. - 2008. - Vol. 8 , no. 1 . β€” P. 13β€”22 . β€” DOI : 10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.13 . β€” PMID 18266512 .
  17. ↑ Foley, M.; Hughes, K.; Librot, H.; Paysnick, A. Imagery Encoding Effects on Memory in the DRM Paradigm: A Test of Competing Predictions (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Applied Cognitive Psychology : journal. - 2009. - Vol. 23 , no. 6 . β€” P. 828β€”848 . β€” DOI : 10.1002/acp.1516 .
  18. ↑ Lee, Spike WS; Norbert Schwarz. Washing away postdecisional dissonance (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Science. - 2010 .-- Vol. 328 , no. 5979 . β€” P. 709 . β€” DOI : 10.1126/science.1186799 . β€” PMID 20448177 .
Π˜ΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊ β€” https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ИскаТСниС_Π²_восприятии_сдСланного_Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°&oldid=101019308


More articles:

  • Max Power Point Tracking
  • Shelyakovo (Moscow region)
  • Jung Jihyun (wrestler)
  • Gombosh, Karoy
  • Koryttsevo (Mozhaisk district)
  • Crow, Rachel
  • Taube, Ferdinand Ivanovich
  • Upper Chemalis
  • Karakai
  • Ivan Ivanovich Koshkin

All articles

Clever Geek | 2019