In cognitive science, a distortion in the perception of a choice is the tendency to retroactively attribute positive qualities to an object or action that a person has chosen. This is cognitive bias . What is remembered about the decision can be just as important as the decisions themselves, especially in determining how much regret or satisfaction a person experiences from the decision made. Studies show that the process of making and remembering choices produces memories that tend to be distorted in a predictable way. Thus, memories of the possibility of choice are distorted by the fact that positive aspects are usually attributed to the chosen option, if they were not originally part of it, and negative aspects, as a rule, are attributed to rejected options. [1] After the action has been completed, we can be biased in the ways in which we evaluate the effectiveness of our decisions. [2] It is believed that this may affect our future decision making. These errors can be saved in the form of memories that are stored in our conscious experience based on subjective qualities, our prior knowledge and beliefs, our motives and goals, and social context. True and false memories arise by the same mechanism, because when the brain processes and stores information, it cannot distinguish where it came from. [3]
General definition
The tendency to remember their decisions is better than they actually were, when people tend to attribute more positive traits to the opportunities that they have chosen, and negative traits to other options. [one]
Theory
Experiments in cognitive science and social psychology have revealed a wide range of deviations in areas such as statistical evidence, social attribution, and memory. [2] A memory distortion that supports choice is thought to occur during a memory search and results from the belief that βI chose this option, so it should be a better choice.β In addition, it is possible that the choice is auxiliary memories and arise when the individual only pays attention to certain information when making a decision or in post-election cognitive dissonance . [4] In addition, prejudices can also arise because they are closely related to high-level cognitive operations and complex social interactions. [5] The distortion of memory is sometimes intentional, because it may be in our interests not to remember some details about the event or to forget them altogether. [6]
Selection Circumstances
The purpose of the selection, as a rule, is to choose the best option. Thus, making a choice, a person is likely to believe that the chosen option was better than the rejected options. Each choice has positive and negative sides. The decision-making process relies heavily on previous experience. Thus, a person will remember not only the decision made, but also the rationale for making such a decision.
Motivation
Motivation can also play a role in this process, because when a person remembers the option that he has chosen as the best, this should help reduce regret about his choice. This can be a positive illusion that contributes to well-being.
Cases that a person does not control
There are cases when a person does not always control the choice made for himself. People often end up with options that were not chosen by them, but were assigned by others, for example, work assignments assigned by superiors, or places of rest chosen by other family members. [7] However, the choice, being assigned (by chance or not), brings to mind the experience, which, as a rule, stands for an alternative to the option not received, which may lead to regret and disappointment. [eight]
- Assigned options : a choice made for you by other people in your interests may cause memory attributions that support that choice. [7] But current experiments do not show distortion in the perception of the choice made for the assigned options. Nevertheless, the choice that is made on behalf of a person in his interests, really shows a tendency to distort in the memory of the perception of choice.
- Random option : people have no distortion in the perception of the choice made, when the choice is made randomly for them. [9] This is because the distortion in the perception of the choice made, as a rule, occurs during the act of making a decision.
Causes of distortion in the perception of the choice made
The understanding of the situation that people have is formed by memories of the choices they make; one university or job is selected, while other options are rejected. Recollections of the choice made, as well as rejected alternatives, can affect a personβs sense of well-being. Regretting the not accepted option can cast a shadow, while satisfaction with the right choice can make a good result. [ten]
Positive Illusions
Distortion in the perception of the choice made often leads to memories that portray the person in an overly favorable light. In general, cognitive prejudice weakens our grip in fact, because the line between reality and fantasy becomes blurred if the brain is not able to recall a specific event. Positive illusions are usually moderate and play an important role in our sense of well-being. However, we all need to know that they exist within the framework of human nature. [five]
Memory for data
Human beings are endowed with intelligence and a complex mind that allows us to remember our past, can optimize the present and make plans for the future. Remembering involves a complex interaction between the current environment that everyone expects to remember and what is preserved from the past. [5] The brain mechanisms that allow us to store and search data in memory serve us well most of the time, but sometimes they cause a person anxiety.
Changing memories over time
There is now much evidence that the contents of memory can go through systematic changes. After a period of time, if data stored in memory is often not used, it can be forgotten.
- Preservation of memory : It is recognized that preservation is best for the experience that is pleasant, the experiences that are unpleasant and the experience that is neutral are less preserved, the worst preserved. Shared memories provide the basis for conclusions that may lead to distortion. These distortions do not appear in the memory in order to supplant specific memories of the individual, but rather they complement and fill in the gaps when the memories are lost. [11] It has been shown that a wide range of strategic and systematic processes are used to activate various areas of the brain in order to obtain information.
- Reliability of memory : People are capable of self-testing memory, in which a person can consider the credibility of the extracted memory, asking himself whether this event is really possible. For example, if a person remembers that he saw a flying pig, he must conclude that it was in a dream, because pigs cannot fly in the real world. Memory does not provide people with perfect reproductions of what happened, it consists only of constructions and reconstructions of what happened. [3]
Areas of the brain that affect memory
There is ample evidence that the amygdala is involved in the effective effect on memory. [12] Emotional arousal, usually based on fright, activates the amygdala and modulates the accumulation of memory data, which occurs in other areas of the brain. The forebrain is one of the goals of the tonsil. The forebrain receives input from the amygdala and calculates the emotional value of the stimulus, forms an emotional response, and transfers it to the cerebral cortex . This can change the way neurons respond to future input of information, and cognitive prejudices, such as distortions in perceptions of choices made, that can influence future decisions.
Stress hormones affect memory
Effects associated with stress hormones, such as adrenaline and glucocorticoids , which mediate effects related to the tonsil. [12] This has been shown in experiments with rats, which, when given systemic adrenaline injections while being trained to complete a task, show improved memory during the task. In fact, the stronger the emotions that are tied to memory, the greater the likelihood that a person will remember these events. Thus, if the memory is stored and retrieved properly, it is less likely to be garbled.
Brain Mapping
PET or MRI can be used to identify various areas of the brain that are activated during a specific memory search.
MRI scan
- True Against False Memories : In one study, subjects were asked to recall a series of events when their brain was monitored by MRI to see which areas would βlight upβ. When a person remembers more true memories than false ones, a cluster is activated in the brain that encompasses the upper right temporal gyrus and lateral occipital cortex . However, when the opposite happened (when a person remembered more false memories than true ones), activation occurred in the area of ββthe brain where the left islet . [13] These results may provide some insight into which areas of the brain are involved in storing memories and then retrieving them.
Distortion in the perception of a choice increases with age.
Studies currently show that when people age, their search process in memory changes. Although memory problems in general are common to all because memory is not perfectly accurate, older people more often than young adults show a distortion in the perception of the choice made.
Brain Aging
Normal aging may be accompanied by peripheral neuropathy in the frontal areas of the brain. Frontal regions help people code or use specific attributes of memory to make initial judgments, control personality and ability to plan events. These areas include memory distortion and regulation of emotions.
Regulation of Emotion
In general, older adults are more likely to remember the emotional aspects of the situation than younger adults. For example, in a characteristic memory questionnaire, older people rated memories of events as having more connected thoughts and feelings than young adults did. As a person grows up, the regulation of their own emotions becomes a higher priority, while the acquisition of knowledge becomes a less powerful motive. Therefore, a distortion in the perception of the choice made arises because their attention was focused on how they felt about the choice, and not on the actual details of the choice. Studies have shown that when young adults are encouraged to recall the emotional aspect of choice, they are more likely to show a distortion in the perception of the choice made. This may be due to a greater tendency of older people to show a positive memory effect.
Hope to meet
Older people more than young people rely on unconditional or general knowledge about the event, so they may not recognize individual elements of the event. [1] Older people are also less likely to remember the contextual features of events, such as colors or location. This may be because older people remember (or rely on) fewer sources of identification characteristics than young people. Consequently, older people should more often think or base the answer on less specific information, for example, on acquaintance. [14] As a result, if they cannot remember something, they are likely to fill in the missing gaps with things that are familiar to them. [five]
Understanding the
Older people rely more on substantive search. A number of studies show that using stereotypes and general knowledge to help recall events is less cognitively demanding than using other types of memory information and thus may require less activity reflecting reality. This shift towards core-based processes can occur as compensation due to age-related impairment in verbal memory. [15]
Inhibition
Occasional memory and inhibition explain age-related increases in false memories. Inhibition of memory may be associated with a personβs hearing capacity and concentration. If a person cannot hear what is happening around him or does not pay much attention, the event in memory cannot be properly preserved and, therefore, cannot be accurately restored.
Examples of perception distortion
The choice between two used cars
Henkel and Maser investigated the role of beliefs at the time of recollection of the chosen option. They gave the participants several hypothetical options, such as choosing between two used cars. Participants selected several options, returned to the laboratory in a week. The researchers reminded them which options they had chosen and gave them a list of the features of the two options; some new positive and negative features of the options were mixed with old ones. Participants were then asked to indicate whether each option was new, was related to their choice, or was related to the option they rejected. At the same time, they gave one subject those options that they really chose, and the other half opposite. Participants approved the options that Henkel and Maser had told them and βrememberedβ them. At the same time, positive traits were more likely attributed to the chosen option and negative traits to the rejected option. These results show that beliefs at the time of extraction of the chosen option are formed by the characteristics of the choice and how vividly they are remembered, and a distortion in the perception of the choice made occurs when a person recalls his past choice. [four]
Remembering High School
One study shows accuracy and distortion in the memory of high school grades. The relationship between accuracy and distortion of the autobiographical content of the memory was examined by checking 3220 high school marks recalled by 99 college freshmen. It was shown that most of the errors are related to the overestimation of their grades by students, which means that these distortions relate to the reconstruction of memory in a positive and emotionally pleasing direction. In addition, their results show that the distortion process does not actually cause the loss of unpleasant memories of receiving a poor grade. [11] This is because no correlation was found between the percent accuracy of the memories and the degree of asymmetry, or distortion. This shows that distortions in the memory of high school grades occur after the content has been forgotten by another mechanism.
50 Year College Study
ΠΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, ΠΏΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠ°. Π ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎ 54 Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ, 276 Π²ΡΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 3025 ΠΈΠ· 3967 ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠΊ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠΊ. Π’ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π΅. ΠΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΎ Π·Π°Π²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π΄ΠΆΠ°, ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π° Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΠ°ΠΌΡΡΠΈ, ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, Π³Π΄Π΅-ΡΠΎ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΠ°ΠΌΡΡΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΡΡ, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. [sixteen]
ΠΠΈΠ· - Π ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ³Π΅Ρ - ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΠ°
Π£ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π» ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ°, ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ² (Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, ΡΠ°Π±Π»ΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°, Π»Π°ΠΌΠΏΠ°, ΡΡΠΎΠ»), Π° Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π² ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠ΅. Π£ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° ( Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, ΡΡΡΠ») Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ "ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ", ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡ Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ» ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° (ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΈ). ΠΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡ "Π΄Π°" Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΊ Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ, ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ DRM. [17]
ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π½ΡΡ
Π’Π΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Ρ. ΠΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π» ΠΠΆΠ΅ΠΊ ΠΡΠ΅ΠΌ (1956), ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Ρ. Π ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° Π±ΡΠ΄Π΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΈΠΊΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ "Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ X" ΠΈ "Π― ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠ» Π² Y".
Π£ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ±Π΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΊΠΈ. Π’ΠΎ Π΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΊ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π±Π°Π²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. [18]
Notes
- β 1 2 3 Mather, M., & Johnson, MK (2000). Choice-supportive source monitoring: Do our decisions seem better to us as we age? Psychology and Aging, 15, 596-606.
- β 1 2 "But That's Crazy! Cognitive Bias in Decision-making | Duncan Pierce." Duncan Pierce | Duncanpierce.org. Web. 18 Sept. 2010. < http://duncanpierce.org/cognitive_bias_workshop ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ 22 ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ°Π»Ρ 2014 Π½Π° Wayback Machine >.
- β 1 2 Johnson, Marcia K. "Memory and Reality." American Psychologist (2006): 760-71. Web. 18 Sept. 2010. ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ (Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠ°) . Date of treatment August 20, 2010. Archived on August 20, 2010. .
- β 1 2 "Memory Distortion in Decision Making." University of Southern California. Web. 18 Sept. 2010. < γ’γΌγ«γ€γγγγγ³γγΌ . ΠΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 8 ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ° 2008. ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ 11 ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ° 2015 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°. >.
- β 1 2 3 4 Schacter, Daniel L. The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002. Print.
- β Gordon, Ruthanna; Franklin, Nancy; Beck, Jennifer. Wishful Thinking and Source Monitoring (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Memory & Cognition : journal. - 2005. - Vol. 33 , no. 3 . β P. 418β429 . β DOI : 10.3758/BF03193060 .
- β 1 2 Mather, M.; Shafir, E.; Johnson, M. Remembering chosen and assigned options (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Memory & Cognition : journal. - 2003. - Vol. 31 , no. 3 . β P. 422β433 . β DOI : 10.3758/BF03194400 .
- β Stoll Benney, Kristen; Henkel, Linda. The Role of Free Choice in Memory for past Decisions (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Memory : journal. - 2006. - Vol. 14 , no. 8 . β P. 1001β1011 . β DOI : 10.1080/09658210601046163 .
- β Henkel, LA; Mather, M. Memory attributions for choices: How beliefs shape our memories (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Journal of Memory and Language : journal. - 2007. - Vol. 57 , no. 2 . β P. 163β176 . β DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.012 . ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ 29 Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ 2011 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΡΡ ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ 29 Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ 2011 Π½Π° Wayback Machine
- β Mather, M.; Shafir, E.; Johnson, MK Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Psychological Science : journal. - 2000. - Vol. 11 , no. 2 . β P. 132β138 . β DOI : 10.1111/1467-9280.00228 . β PMID 11273420 .
- β 1 2 Bahrick, Harry P.; Hall, Lynda K.; Berger, Stephanie A. Accuracy and Distortion in Memory for High School Grades (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Psychological Science : journal. - 1996. - Vol. 7 , no. 5 . β P. 265β271 . β DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00372.x .
- β 1 2 McGaugh, James L.; Cahill, Larry; Roozendaal, Benno. Involvement of the Amygdala in Memory Storage: Interaction with Other Brain Systems (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America : journal. - 1996. - Vol. 93 , no. 24 . β P. 13508β13514 . β DOI : 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13508 .
- β Baym, CL; Gonsalves, BD Comparison of neural activity that leads to true memories, false memories, and forgetting: An fMRI study of the misinformation effect (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci : journal. - 2010 .-- Vol. 10 , no. 3 . β P. 339β348 . β DOI : 10.3758/CABN.10.3.339 . β PMID 20805535 .
- β Dodson, C.; Bawa, S.; Slotnick, S. Aging, source memory, and misrecollections (Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡ.) // Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition. β 2007. β Π’. 33 . β Π‘. 169β181 . β DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.169 .
- β Lovden, M. The episodic memory and inhibition accounts of age-related increases in false memories: A consistency check (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Journal of Memory and Language : journal. - 2003. - Vol. 49 , no. 2 . β P. 268β283 . β DOI : 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00069-X .
- β Bahrick, HP; Hall, LK; Da Costa, LA Fifty years of memory of college grades: Accuracy and distortions (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Emotion : journal. - 2008. - Vol. 8 , no. 1 . β P. 13β22 . β DOI : 10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.13 . β PMID 18266512 .
- β Foley, M.; Hughes, K.; Librot, H.; Paysnick, A. Imagery Encoding Effects on Memory in the DRM Paradigm: A Test of Competing Predictions (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Applied Cognitive Psychology : journal. - 2009. - Vol. 23 , no. 6 . β P. 828β848 . β DOI : 10.1002/acp.1516 .
- β Lee, Spike WS; Norbert Schwarz. Washing away postdecisional dissonance (Π°Π½Π³Π».) // Science. - 2010 .-- Vol. 328 , no. 5979 . β P. 709 . β DOI : 10.1126/science.1186799 . β PMID 20448177 .