Islamic theology includes such disciplines as Islamic law ( Fiqh ),creed ( akida ), rationalistic theology ( calam ) the interpretation of the Koran ( tafsir ), Hadith ( ilm al-Hadith ) etc.
Akida
Muslim belief ( Akida ) is a kind of foundation of dogmas, ideas and ideas. It appeared in the period of active addition of the Islamic dogmatic-legal system (VIII c.), The immediate predecessor of which was written in the genre of "refutation" ( Rudd ) works. Unlike refutations, which were frankly polemical in nature, the Akida was a concise, clear text of a proclamatory character, which outlines the positions of a dogmatic school or an individual author in the basic issues of Islamic dogma and law (fiqh). The provisions postulated in the Akida are preceded by the formulas "one must believe in ..." ( al-iman bi ... ), "we are convinced that ..." ( for 'takiyud ) and others like them [1] .
The text of one of the first Akida goes back to the group of Syrian theologians (Umaya ibn Usman, Ahmad ibn Khalid ibn Muslim, Muhammad ibn Abdullah), who at the beginning of the VIII century. They spoke on behalf of the Sunnis (Ahlyu S-Sunna Wal-Jama'a) with a brief statement of the concept of faith . In the period of the formation of the main dogmatic schools of Islam (IX-XI centuries) such famous books on akida appeared, such as al-Fiqh al-Akbar and Kitab al-Vasiyah, attributed to Imam Abu Hanif , Akida al-Tahavi, as well as a number of akid pen belonging to the most prominent representatives of Mutazilism. In the middle of the IX. the Baqdad traditionalists made a series of aqids, the most famous of which are the six aqids of Ahmad ibn Hanbal . In the X - early XI century. the first asharite akids (Akida al-Ash'ari) are created, the anti-traditionalist βal-'Aqida an-Nizamiyaβ al-Juvaini, the Malikite - βar-Risalβ Ibn Abu Zeid al-Kairuvani [1] .
From the IX c. In the Akida began to be introduced the system of evidence of the main provisions, which included special "doxographic" parts. The development of Islamic dogma and law in the X century. led to the emergence of arches, which received the Muslim tradition of the name "Akida" or "i'tikad." These codes included the presentation and justification of the main dogmatic ideas, legal, ethical, ritual norms and rules. The most significant works of this kind belong to al-Ashari (X c.), Ibn Batta (X c.), Al-Ghazali (XI c.), Ash-Shahrastani (XII c.), Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani ( XII century.), Najmu-d-dinu an-Nasafi (XIV century.), Ibn Taymiyah (XIV century.) And other authors [2] .
Despite the emergence of expanded arches, a simple and accessible brief Akida remained one of the main forms of public βproclaimingβ the foundations of the faith. In the XI century, she was elected to declare "orthodoxy" on behalf of the supreme power ("Kadirite creed") [2] .
Kalam
A speculative discipline that gives a reason-based interpretation of Islamic dogma is called kalam ('ilm alkalam). Appeal to the mind as the highest authority in dealing with certain issues united calam with falsafa. The difference between the champions of kalam ( mutakallim ) and falsaf ( falasif ) was seen in the fact that the first, for the starting point of their reasoning, were repelled by problems specific to this religion, and the latter were based on ancient models of philosophizing. Falasif themselves saw the main difference of their science from Kalam in the methods of reasoning: in Falsaf, apodictic reasoning is used, and in Kalam - dialectical (in the Aristotelian sense of the term). In conducting the controversy, the Mutakallims most often resorted to deducing from the theses accepted by the opponent, undesirable for him or absurd conclusions (Ilsam) [3] .
Kalam emerged and developed initially during discussions with various religious-political groups (Kharijites, cadarites, Djabrits, Murdzhiits), as well as disputes with representatives of other religions (Mazdeism, Christianity). In these disputes, the method of reasoning inherent in kalam was developed, based on the symbolic-allegorical interpretation (ta'vil) of the Qur'an and excluding references to religious authorities (taklid) when arguing one or another thesis [3] .
The main problems of Kalam (Kalam kernel) are:
- qualities necessary for the leader of the Muslims (caliph, imam);
- the responsibility of a person for his actions (free will and predestination) [3] ;
- the qualification of a person as just a Muslim ( muslim ), as a true believer ( mu'min ), as an unbeliever ( kafir ), and as a person who has committed a serious sin ( sahib al-Kabir );
- the unity of God ( tawhid ) and the ratio of its essence and attributes;
- the creation or non-creation of the Qur'an in time [4] .
The βsubtletiesβ of kalam ( Dakik al-Qalal, latif al-Qalal ) were of a natural-philosophical nature (movement and rest, substance and accidents, atoms and emptiness) [4] .
The method and problems characteristic of kalam are first encountered in the works of Jad ibn Dirham (executed in 742-43). He demanded to rely only on reason and subject Koranβs verses that contradict him to symbolism and allegorical interpretation (Tawil). Ema thought that it was impossible to ascribe to God eternal positive attributes, about the creation of the Qur'an in time, etc. His disciple Jahm ibn Safwan (executed in 745) spoke about the ability of reason, regardless of revelation, to distinguish good from evil and developed a pantheistically oriented doctrine, which affirmed the principle of fatalism. Jad ibn Dirham , Jahm ibn Safwan , and Dirar ibn Amr anticipated with their views the ideas of the Mu'Δzilit school of kalam, which flourished in the first half of the 9th century [4] .
Beginning with the rule of al-Mutawakkil (847-861), mutazilism was subjected to persecution. Under these conditions, Abul-Hasan al-Ashari (873-935) made an attempt to legalize Kalam by compromise with dogmatists. The largest representatives of the Asharite school were al-Bakkillani (died in 1013), al-Juvaini (died in 1085), ash-Shahrastani (died in 1153) and Fakhruddin al-Razi (died in 1209 g.). From the 13th century begins the convergence of kalam with falsaf with the eastern peripateticism of the school of Ibn Sina. The rapprochement was prepared by the Mutakallims by the works of Al-Shahrastani and Fakhruddin Al- Razi , and by Falasif - Nasiruddin Al-Tusi. The stage of mixing kalam and falsaf is represented by the works of al-Baydawi (died in 1286), al-Isfahani (died in 1349), al-Iji (died in 1355), al-Taftazani (died in 1390), al-Dzhurdzhani (died in 1413), ad-Davvani (died in 1501), as-Sialkuti (died in 1657) [4] .
Along with the main schools of Kalam, there was a school of followers of Abu Mansur al-Maturidi (died in 944). Kalam was attacked by the hanbalites and zahirits. At the same time, Ash'arite Qalam spread among the Shafi'ites, maturidism found supporters among the Hanafis, and Mu'tazilism among the Zaydi. In the new and modern times, the Kalam inspiration was inspired by Islamic reformers ( Jamaluddin al-Afghani , Muhammad Abdo ), liberal thinkers ( Ahmad Amin , Zaki Najib Mahmood ) and βIslamic leftistsβ ( Hassan Hanafi ) [4] .
Fiq
Until the first half of the 8th century, the system of social, including legal, norms of the Muslim state consisted mainly of norms that had a pre-Islamic origin and continued to operate. Islam was initially indifferent to legal issues, and the legal system of the caliphate accepted certain elements of Roman Byzantine , Sassanian , Talmudic , Eastern Christian law, some local customs of the territories conquered by the Arabs, many of which were later Islamized and included in fikh [5] .
In the eighth and first half of the ninth century, the language and methodology developed in fiqh jurisprudence; The main sources of legal decisions were the Koran and Sunnah . The unanimous opinion of the Muslim community - ijma - was recognized as an independent source of legal decisions. It was concluded that the faqihs should extract answers to any practical questions from the Qur'an and Sunnah, and methods of such extraction were gradually developed ( al-truthb ). They were the basis of ijtihad . The conditions for the formulation of new norms were established by analogy by extracting the ratio legis ( illah ) from already known decisions, thus another source of legal decisions was recognized - qiyas . The recognition of the kiyas signified the emergence of a special fiqh direction - usul al-fiqh [6] .
Around the 10th century, fiqh jurisprudence finally emerged as an independent religious discipline. Gradually, it became generally accepted to understand fiqh as the science of the βpracticalβ (regulating people's behavior) shari'at norms ( 'ilm al-furou ), βextractedβ from their specific sources (Koran, Sunna, ijma, ijtihad, etc.). Fiqh began to include the study of two categories of norms: the rules of worship and the performance of religious duties ( Ibadat ); rules governing relations between people, the state and citizens, etc. ( mu'amalate ) [6]
Already at the early stage of the formation of fiqh, two of his schools were outlined: the Iraqi one, which used ijtihad more widely, not reducing it only to qiyasu; Medina, which focused on the Koran and the Sunnah. In the 9th β 10th centuries, other Sunni schools (madhhabs) were formed, in particular Shafi'itsky, characterized by strict use of ijtihad, identified with kiyas, as well as hanbalit mazhab, known for its widest use of the Koran and Hadith and distrustful attitude to ijtihad. Ja'farit (Imami), Zeidit, and Isma'ilite madhhabs currently operate in Shiite Islam [6] . The teachings of each of the madhhabs are presented in works, most of which are written in the early and classical Middle Ages by the founders of the madhhab, their closest students and followers [7] .
From the middle of the 9th century, the idea that only the great lawyers of the past had the right to ijtihad gradually became established in Sunnism. In the middle of the 10th century, a tacit consensus was reached, which made the emergence of new madhhabs impossible with its own system of ways to formulate legal decisions (fatwas). The need to follow the teachings of a certain madhhab is called taklid . Since then, the development of fiqh has continued within the recognized madhhabs [7] .
The most developed branch of fiqh-law is the right of personal status ( al-Akhval al-shakhsia ) - a set of rules governing marriage and family, hereditary, and some other close relations to them. However, even in the marriage-family area, local customs competed with fiqh-law, which nullified its individual provisions. The branch of criminal law ( 'ukubat' ), which included sanctions for all offenses regardless of their nature, directly depended on the governmentβs policy, which was reflected in the relationship between its secular and spiritual functions. The norms of state, administrative and financial law ( al-akhkam as-sultaniya ), the relations of Muslim authorities with other states, the order of warfare and the division of military booty ( as-syar ) were a relatively secondary element of law, more or less consistently implemented only in tax matters. legal status of non-Muslims, etc. It should also be borne in mind that although fiqh-law was central to legal systems, it did not cover all legal norms applied in the Middle Ages Islamic countries. Along with fiqh-law, there were also acts of a state under European law (for example, in the Ottoman Empire under the βcapitulation regimeβ, as well as numerous legal practices ( adat ) [8] .
In the second half of the XIX century, in the legal systems of the most developed Islamic countries, fiqh-law gave way to legislation, which was copied primarily from Western European models. As a result, fiqh retained its position mainly in the regulation of relations of personal status [8] . For the development of al-F.-jurisprudence in the second half of XIX - early XX century. the appearance of works in the form of bills, which were prepared on behalf of the authorities, but did not receive state recognition, was characteristic [9] .
Although starting from the second half of the XIX century, the general trend was a steady decline in the role of fiqh. At present, in the countries with the predominant part of the Muslim population, to some degree or another, separate branches, institutions and fiqh norms continue to be applied [9] .
In modern conditions, fiqh jurisprudence has retained its value as a formal source of law. A number of laws of Muslim countries, in the absence of a rule in the law, provide for the application of the findings of fiqh jurisprudence. A similar principle is established by the civil codes of such countries as Algeria, Kuwait, and others, which in fact accept the conclusions of Islamic jurists as the source of solving cases in the case of silence of the law. The legislation of Bahrain, Iran and other countries allows the use of fiqh-law on all matters that are not regulated by law [9] .
At present, the constitutions of many Islamic countries recognize the fundamental source of fiqh as the main source of legislation. Therefore, in the preparation of relevant legislation is widely used classical works on fiqh. From the middle of the 20th century, the works of modern lawyers in various branches and fiqh-law institutes became widespread. In modern literature, an important place is occupied by studies on the comparative study of fiqh as a whole and its individual branches and modern legislation and other legal systems [9] .
Tafsir
Writings related to the science of understanding and interpreting the Qur'an ( 'ilm al-Qur'an vat-tafsir ) played a crucial role in the development of Islamic religious doctrine and reflected the main stages of the ideological and political struggle in the Arab-Muslim society [10] . In the course of the prophetic activity of Muhammad, the content of the text of the Quran underwent significant changes: some of the previously recited ayahs were replaced with new ones ( naskh and mansukh ), others received new interpretations, and others due to the specificity of the text were not clearly reversed. All this required the Prophet to give an interpretation of the βrevelationsβ expressed. The associates of the Prophet Muhammad kept in mind the circumstances of the pronunciation of many ayahs, the causes of the controversy of the Prophet with his opponents. This is the most ancient stratum, which in one form or another has entered into most of the tafsir, reflecting the real history of the origin of the Koran. Over time, the importance of interpreting the Qur'an increased [10] .
Initially, tafsir was mostly orally [10] . Imams of mosques often commented on individual verses and suras after the Friday sermon (khutba). Wandering narrators and preachers ( kussas ) enriched interpretations with parallel material that goes back to the Judeo-Christian cultural environment ( Israel ) [11] . The development of tafsir is associated with the addition of the sunna of the prophet Muhammad. In the second half of the 8th century, collections of hadiths appeared, related to the interpretation of the Koranic text, embodying the principle of βsunna clarifies the Koranβ ( as-sunna tufassir-l-Qur'an ). Later, special sections appeared in general collections of hadiths (for example, in Sahih al-Bukhari ). In the biography of the Prophet ( sira ), the ayahs were placed in an eventual context. In the writings of Muslim jurists ( fakih ), the subject of careful study and interpretation was ayahs related to legal norms. To a large extent, the first Arabic lexicographical and grammatical writings were associated with the needs of interpreting the Qur'an. The formation of the "science of tafsir" took place in close cooperation with the development of the teachings on the "readings" ( kiraat ) of the Qur'an and in the framework of the formation of the general dogmatic system of Islam. In this system, the Quran was declared the main "miracle" ( mu'jiz ), the main evidence of the superiority of the Muslim religious doctrine ( i'jaz al-Qur'an ), the main divine "sign" ( ayat ), confirmation of the truth of Muhammad's prophecy. Within this complex of disciplines, special essays began to arise on the interpretation of the Qur'an, which inherited the research procedure already developed and the terminological apparatus that was formed. ΠΠΎ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΈΡΠ»Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ·Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π΄Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΉ Π±ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΡΡ Π°ΠΌΠΌΠ°Π΄Π° β ΠΠ±Π΄ΡΠ»Π»Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ±Π½ ΠΠ±Π±Π°Ρ (ΡΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΆΡΠΌΠ°Π½ Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΡΡ'Π°Π½, ΡΠΌ. Π² 686 Π³.) [11] .
ΠΠ±ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΠ±Π±Π°ΡΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π»ΠΎ Β«Π½Π°ΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Β» ΠΎΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π² Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Π΅ Π·Π° Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΡ Π² ΠΡΠ°Π±ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ . ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠ½Π½ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΊΠΈ (642β722) ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠΆΡ'ΡΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 745-46 Π³.) ΠΈ Π°Ρ-Π‘ΡΠ΄Π΄ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π΄ΠΎ 745 Π³.). Π’ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ Π² ΠΡΡΠ΅ [11] .
Π‘ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ( ΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Ρ ), ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊ ΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊ ΠΈ Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΄ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ²ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·Ρ ' ΠΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ±Π½ ΠΠ±Ρ Π’Π°Π»ΠΈΠ±Π° ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π²ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Π² Β«ΠΈΠ·Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈΒ» ( ΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΈΡ ) ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ° ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΄Π° ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ² [11] . ΠΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΡΠ½Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π° ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π±ΡΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ( Π·Π°Ρ ΠΈΡ ) ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Β«ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ», Β«ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π° ( Π±Π°ΡΠΈΠ½ ). ΠΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΠ±Π±Π°ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠ» ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π°. ΠΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ° Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°ΠΌΡΠ½Π° (813β833), ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ» ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ [11] . Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡβΡΠ°'Π²ΠΈΠ»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π°ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ [11] .
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠΎΠΌΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ Π·Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π€Π°Ρ Ρ Π°Π΄-Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π° Π°Ρ-Π Π°Π·ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1209 Π³.) ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΡ'ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ ΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ [12] . ΠΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Ρ-Π‘Π°'Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1035 Π³.), Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°ΠΉΠ΄Π°Π²ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1286 Π³.), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΠΆ. Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°Ρ Π°Π»Π»ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1459 Π³.) ΠΈ Π°Ρ-Π‘ΡΡΡΠΈ ( Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠΆΠ°Π»Π°Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½ ) [12] .
ΠΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ΄ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ± ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ Π½ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ² ( Π°ΡΠ±Π°Π± Π°Π½-Π½ΡΠ·ΡΠ»Ρ ), ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ΅. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°Ρ-Π‘ΡΡΡΠΈ, Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°Ρ ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1075 Π³.) ΠΈ Π°Π»Ρ-'ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1175 Π³.) [12] . Π‘ ΠΆΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ Π°ΡΠ±Π°Π± Π°Π½-Π½ΡΠ·ΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π°ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ (ΠΈΠ»ΡΠΌ Π°Π½-Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π²Π° Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΡΡ ). ΠΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠ»Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π° (ΡΠΈΠΊΡ ). ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΠ±Π½ Π₯Π°Π·ΠΌΠ° (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1064 Π³.), Π°Π½-ΠΠ°Ρ Ρ Π°ΡΠ° (ΡΠΌ. Π² 950 Π³.) ΠΈ Π₯ΠΈΠ±Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π»Π°Ρ Π° ΠΈΠ±Π½ Π‘Π°Π»Π°ΠΌΡ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1019 Π³.) [12] .
Π‘ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Ρ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Β«ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΡΒ» ( ΡΠ°Π΄Π»Ρ ) ΠΈ Β«Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΒ» ( ΡΠ°Π΄Π°'ΠΈΠ»Ρ ) ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π°, ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΡ ΠΈ Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Ρ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π°: ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠ»Π»Π°Ρ Π°, ΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠΊΠ²Ρ (ΠΌΡΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ°, Π°Π»Ρ-ΡΠ°Π²Π°ΡΠΈΡ ), Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π³ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ( Π°Π΄ΠΆΡ ) ΠΈ Ρ. Π΄. Π ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ Π‘Π²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠ³ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½, Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡΡ Ρ Π°ΡΠ°Π±ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ [12] .
ΠΠ° ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ΅ XIXβXX Π²Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π° Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΊΠ·Π΅Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΡΡΠ»ΡΡ [12] . Π‘ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ, Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ, Π²Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΌΡΡΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π² ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΉ β ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΌΠΈΠ½ Π°Π»-Π₯ΡΠ»ΠΈ (ΡΠΌ. Π² 1965 Π³.) ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π», ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΉΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π· Β«Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΒ» ( Π°Ρ-ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π°Π»Ρ-'ΠΈΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈ ). Π ΡΡΡΠ΄Π°Ρ Π’Π°Π½ΡΠ°Π²ΠΈ ΠΠΆΠ°ΡΡ Π°ΡΠΈ (1862β1940), Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°Π²Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ±ΠΈ (1849β1903) ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»: ΠΎΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ [12] .
Π’Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Π΅, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΈΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡ. Π‘ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠ°Π³Π°Π½Π΄Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΈ. Π‘Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡ. Π£ ΡΡΠ½Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π°Π»Ρ-ΠΠ°Π½Π°Ρ ΠΡΡ Π°ΠΌΠΌΠ°Π΄Π° 'ΠΠ±Π΄ΠΎ (1849β1905) ΠΈ Π Π°ΡΠΈΠ΄Π° Π ΠΈΠ΄Π° (1865β1935) [12] .
ΠΠ»ΡΠΌ Π°Π»Ρ-Ρ Π°Π΄ΠΈΡ
Notes
- β 1 2 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 17
- β 1 2 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 18.
- β 1 2 3 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 128.
- β 1 2 3 4 5 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 129.
- β ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 254.
- β 1 2 3 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 255.
- β 1 2 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 256.
- β 1 2 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 257.
- β 1 2 3 4 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 258.
- β 1 2 3 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 232.
- β 1 2 3 4 5 6 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 233.
- β 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΠΠ‘, 1991 , Ρ. 234.
Literature
- ΠΡΠ»Π°ΠΌ: ΡΠ½ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ / ΠΡΠ². ed. S.M. Prozorov . - M .: Science ,GRVL , 1991 β ISBN 5-02-016941-2 .